if you were to work on cardio by:
1. sprinting only
or
2. long distance running only
which one would u get more results from? given that u spend the same exact amount of time for each.
if i am aiming for results in my appearance and im trying to look good, which one is the better choice? i am slim and tall but i have stomach fat and not much muscle. i dont care as much for endurance or explosiveness (im probably going to get flamed for this but at least im being honest haha)
what does sprinting target on the body? does jogging target anything?
i have heard that sprinting gives you more results with your abdominal area but is it true? i have not seen that stated in any of the articles i have read. or is it just a pure leg workout
i would prefer sprinting cus i hate jogging but is it going to give me as much results as if i were to spend the same amount of time jogging?
is long distance running better for fat burning or is that just outdated research
what if i only have about an hour a day to run? would 15 minutes worth of sprinting give the same results as 45 minutes of slower jogging? can sprinting work with your endurance as effectively as l.d. running
i have read the running man article and some other ones and i have learned that HIIT where u mix sprinting and jogging is the best
but wouldnt u be able to spend less time running if u excercise at HIGH intensity the whole time instead of mixing it with both jogging and sprinting? or is it that u get different results from each kind of running?
also, when u see people jogging very slowly, does that benefit you if you do it for a long time?
what would the body of a pure sprinter look like compared to a body of a long distance runner? assuming that none of them lift weights or do other excercises
a lot more people here seem to prefer sprints but is that only because they lift?
my junior high PE class taught me that sprinting is anaerobic which wouldnt burn any fat, but there seems to be a lot more articles that say the opposite now
1. sprinting only
or
2. long distance running only
which one would u get more results from? given that u spend the same exact amount of time for each.
if i am aiming for results in my appearance and im trying to look good, which one is the better choice? i am slim and tall but i have stomach fat and not much muscle. i dont care as much for endurance or explosiveness (im probably going to get flamed for this but at least im being honest haha)
what does sprinting target on the body? does jogging target anything?
i have heard that sprinting gives you more results with your abdominal area but is it true? i have not seen that stated in any of the articles i have read. or is it just a pure leg workout
i would prefer sprinting cus i hate jogging but is it going to give me as much results as if i were to spend the same amount of time jogging?
is long distance running better for fat burning or is that just outdated research
what if i only have about an hour a day to run? would 15 minutes worth of sprinting give the same results as 45 minutes of slower jogging? can sprinting work with your endurance as effectively as l.d. running
i have read the running man article and some other ones and i have learned that HIIT where u mix sprinting and jogging is the best
but wouldnt u be able to spend less time running if u excercise at HIGH intensity the whole time instead of mixing it with both jogging and sprinting? or is it that u get different results from each kind of running?
also, when u see people jogging very slowly, does that benefit you if you do it for a long time?
what would the body of a pure sprinter look like compared to a body of a long distance runner? assuming that none of them lift weights or do other excercises
a lot more people here seem to prefer sprints but is that only because they lift?
my junior high PE class taught me that sprinting is anaerobic which wouldnt burn any fat, but there seems to be a lot more articles that say the opposite now