Split decisions should mean the champion retains the title.

[Tuf_guy]

You should feel bad for making this hackneyed post.

It's cause I'm jonesing.

 

[revoltub]

Dumber than the Painted Heart thread.

 

[revoltub]

split decisions shouldn't exist, they should be draws.

They cant be draws.

 

[TallGHunter]

Yeah, some guy who's worked his ass off should lose because a Cecil people or some other half wit can't get it right.

 

[wilKO]

I don't know what any of this means.

You don't know football? I gave a basketball reference for people that somehow don't know football.

 

[randomalias]

And for every conflicting round between the cards, they should ask why the fuck they weren't scored 10-10's.

That is a very good point actually.

 

[mahavishnunj]

This is a stupid idea for many reasons.

#1 there are often rediclious split decisions where one judge is completely out to lunch from every other score card and you’re now extending the fight.

#2 Basically you could end up having unlimited rounds to get away with a split. For example if MM vs Henry if MM wins round 6 on 2/3 judges score cards the cards could have ended up being 57-55, 56-56, 55-57 which ensure that at least 3 more rounds are required to reach an unanimous decision.

Basically this idea is bad and you should feel bad.

You have in no way whatsoever described how this is a bad idea. You should feel bad for posting a non counter argument. You also misspelled 'ridiculous'.