Surpass? Nothing. Essentially equal to or would get the job done. Any semi auto center fire with quality ammo.
The AR really is the Swiss Army knife. It encompasses calibers from .22lr, pistol calibers intermediate calibers, magnum, etc. Barrel lengths from 3" to 26"+. You can set it up for literally any purpose other than probably elr shooting.
To illustrate that comparing them to assault rifles isn't necessarily some stretch of the imagination. They can be configured to basically be semi automatic assault rifles.
If it's the Swiss Army knife of rifles couldn't you build one for CQB? If you wanted to kill people what other firearm available to civilians would surpass it's effectiveness?
First off..
I am NOT anti-gun, I do not currently own any weapons but I have used them in the past to hunt and kill my own food. I served and retired from the Military and am an expert on the M-16 and M-9 platforms.
This is a "Block 19" kit that makes your Glock look like it's made of Legos.
To illustrate that comparing them to assault rifles isn't necessarily some stretch of the imagination. They can be configured to basically be semi automatic assault rifles.
I served in the USAF for 24 years and retired honorably. To remain in the USAF you must be qualified on the standard weapons platform and maintain proficiency. During my time it was the M-16. I qualified "Expert" on it and the M-9 during range training. That means both with accuracy and with maintenance of the weapons.
That being said...
Wow. So now you're just going to outright lie on me huh?
Youassumed to know how I thought based on a vote that you didn't like. Do I think that an AR-15 should be in the hands of the populace? No. It should be for law-enforcement and military/guard/law enforcement/and authorized militia. That's my own personal opinion and my opinion and an empty sack is worth the sack.
Tell you what.. SHOW me in that thread where I typed out that an AR is a machine gun and I will self ban from Sherdog.
If you can't, you're a lying sack of crayon chewing filth and you'll be the first jackhole that will ever have the honor of being on my ignore list permanently.
According to Sherdog, I never voted in the poll or even posted in that thread you linked. So what does that make you?
Here's the part where you respond with a gif or meme of some sort because you got nothing.
I served in the USAF for 24 years and retired honorably. To remain in the USAF you must be qualified on the standard weapons platform and maintain proficiency. During my time it was the M-16. I qualified "Expert" on it and the M-9 during range training. That means both with accuracy and with maintenance of the weapons.
That being said...
Wow. So now you're just going to outright lie on me huh?
Youassumed to know how I thought based on a vote that you didn't like. Do I think that an AR-15 should be in the hands of the populace? No. It should be for law-enforcement and military/guard/law enforcement/and authorized militia. That's my own personal opinion and my opinion and an empty sack is worth the sack.
Tell you what.. SHOW me in that thread where I typed out that an AR is a machine gun and I will self ban from Sherdog.
If you can't, you're a lying sack of crayon chewing filth and you'll be the first jackhole that will ever have the honor of being on my ignore list permanently.
According to Sherdog, I never voted in the poll or even posted in that thread you linked. So what does that make you?
Here's the part where you respond with a gif or meme of some sort because you got nothing.
I never even voted in it. I never posted in the thread. You've got nothing. You're a sad person who has shown Sherdog the quality of your character and you have been found wanting.
I never even voted in it. I never posted in the thread. You've got nothing. You're a sad person who has shown Sherdog the quality of your character and you have been found wanting.
I never even voted in it. I never posted in the thread. You've got nothing. You're a sad person who has shown Sherdog the quality of your character and you have been found wanting.
Yet, he linked a screenshot with your name clearly being in the "yes" category of the votes. You do see your name there, right? Given that someone can change/remove their vote at any time, I'm leaning towards you simply doing that after he called you on it, rather than him going through the process of shooping your name in there
Yet, he linked a screenshot with your name clearly being in the "yes" category of the votes. You do see your name there, right? Given that someone can change/remove their vote at any time, I'm leaning towards you simply doing that after he called you on it, rather than him going through the process of shooping your name in there
Your statement is that you didn't vote on it, period. However, your name is clearly there in the "yes" votes in the screenshot he linked. Your only real argument could be that it was faked somehow. If it wasn't faked, then you very clearly voted "Yes" in that poll and then removed your vote sometime after he saved that screenshot.
Your statement is that you didn't vote on it, period. However, your name is clearly there in the "yes" votes in the screenshot he linked. Your only real argument could be that it was faked somehow. If it wasn't faked, then you very clearly voted "Yes" in that poll and then removed your vote sometime after he saved that screenshot.
Violence/Genocide: Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.