- Joined
- Aug 24, 2018
- Messages
- 2,665
- Reaction score
- 2,203
It's not boring. You find it boring. Different folks etc...A) who cares if a sport is diverse?
B) soccer is painfully boring, not to mention damn near every match is 1-1 or 2-1
It's not boring. You find it boring. Different folks etc...A) who cares if a sport is diverse?
B) soccer is painfully boring, not to mention damn near every match is 1-1 or 2-1
same thing with american sport. nfl i mean 6 points 3 points 2 points i mean crazy how boring it is . 2 scores and there is 14 points on board i meanA) who cares if a sport is diverse?
B) soccer is painfully boring, not to mention damn near every match is 1-1 or 2-1
same thing with american sport. nfl i mean 6 points 3 points 2 points i mean crazy how boring it is . 2 scores and there is 14 points on board i mean
I get the point inflation thing but if you made every NFL touchdown 1 point(FG .5) it doesn't change that football has a lot more scoring than soccer. A common football score would be say 4-3(28-21). 3-2(21-14) would be a defensive game. And that's really what a lot of US fans are looking for when they say soccer is too low scoring 2 or 3 goals on each side.
Right now the Broncos are getting crucified for averaging 14 points a game the second lowest in the 21st century. This would be like averaging 2 goals a game. That's historically awful. For a soccer team I imagine averaging 2 a game is quite solid.
I get the point inflation thing but if you made every NFL touchdown 1 point(FG .5) it doesn't change that football has a lot more scoring than soccer. A common football score would be say 4-3(28-21). 3-2(21-14) would be a defensive game. And that's really what a lot of US fans are looking for when they say soccer is too low scoring 2 or 3 goals on each side.
Right now the Broncos are getting crucified for averaging 14 points a game the second lowest in the 21st century. This would be like averaging 2 goals a game. That's historically awful. For a soccer team I imagine averaging 2 a game is quite solid.
The average EPL broadcast has more goals per minute than the average NFL broadcast has TDs per minute.
The average EPL game has 2.8 goals.
The average EPL broadcast lasts 116.6 minutes.
That's 1 goal every 41.6 minutes.
The average NFL game has 4.8 TDs.
The average NFL broadcast lasts 208.5 minutes.
That's 1 TD every 43.4 minutes.
Soccer in early 20th century(the form that the world originally fell in love with) was more exciting many more goals offense favoring formations. Since then they've adopted the Italian way of 1-0. When you bring this issue up to soccer fans they go into some snobbery about ball movement and not appreciating the "action" of 90 minutes of passing.
Seeing teams try and fail to score for long periods of time is very frustrating. You don't get points for being creative you get points for scoring goals.
And even on top how low-scoring fussball is(even relative to football/baseball), there's no high spots(outside of scoring) or segmenting of the action.
Now it's transparent that you don't get the sport. There is no shame in that, it's a cultural issue. For me, for example, anything but a home run in baseball is a non-thing.
You can have low scored or even 0-0 games with an insane amount of highlight plays in soccer.
Lol. Why are you just making things up.Its a great game, simple, anyone can learn the rules easy and anyone can play it.
There are also more goals in soccer than in NFL, on average, only thing in NFL one counts goal as like 9 or something.
The last World Cup to average more than 3 goals per game was in 1958; more than 64 years ago. That was Pele's first World Cup, and soccer has grown immensely since then.
So what are the soccer equivalents to things like the following:
Base hit, double, triple
Stolen base
Double play
Highlight reel catch
Strikeout
Innings
Etc.
So what are the soccer equivalents to things like the following:
Base hit, double, triple
Stolen base
Double play
Highlight reel catch
Strikeout
Innings
Etc.