yes.
and btw he hasn't stripped Conor yet. he said he would strip him "once the first punch has been thrown". it's arguable he was suggesting "once the first fight was thrown (between #1 and #2 contenders)" and therefore still has a loophole to not strip Conor and call himself not inconsistent.
so you nailed it. while there is no clear policy about champs, stripping of belts, titles, interim titles, and interim interim champ champs, the answer is indeed "Dana White says who is UFC champion, what happens in the octagon doesn't mean anything."
some of us who are concerned that the sport - which has always been a hybrid of sports and entertainment - has swung too far toward the entertainment side of things. below is a Mike Brown quote:
“I think it used to be you would find it was 80 percent merit, and 20 percent entertainment/money to make the fights. Now I think that it’s almost 80 percent money than the merit. I honestly didn’t see it coming so quickly.”
and we think that UFC should create more policies title shots and championship...
and more importantly, stick to the policies he creates. but until then, i suppose we should just enjoy the ride for what it is.