imo alvarez deserves it. but i know the just bleed crowd thinks differently.
I'm not part of the "just bleed crowd" but there's no way Alvarez deserves it.
I think your opinion is one that Jeff Wagenheim will share. He's trying to fit a square peg into a round hole in how he thinks about MMA, by treating it the same way you treat traditional sports that have seasons. For example, the top team in each division of an American sports league go to the playoffs. Or the top 4 teams in the Premier League go to the Champions League. MMA can't work like that. For example, if you beat the #1 guy and the #4 guy (or whatever Melendez was) then that's better than beating the #7 guy (Barboza) and #10 guy (Thomson). I don't know the rankings, and that's just an example. It can't be that simple.
Fighters don't fight on a regular schedule, and can't fight on a regular schedule for health reasons. Every individual fight is a spectacle. It's the same reason people say "MMA is a sport but not a game", and that people can't just "play MMA", after school like they can "play basketball" or "play soccer".
So, what I'm getting at is that you shouldn't try and set up some sort of merit system. I feel that's how you came to the conclusion that Alvarez > Ferguson? I don't think you should be that simplistic. You need to look at the content of the fight and the context of the wins. Ferguson has looked way better than Alvarez in his wins, is on a longer win streak, and frankly just looks like a better fighter. I don't think Alvarez even deserved to win his last fight, and arguably could be on a 3-fight losing streak.