- Joined
- May 11, 2011
- Messages
- 2,822
- Reaction score
- 0
This literally makes 0 sense.
This literally makes 0 sense.
He was the #1 MW of UFC between 2002-2004 after Bustamante left the org.
He was well ranked at a time when Middleweight was one of the weaker divisions in the sport.
He never had what I consider a real marquee win. Good but not great fighter.
Franklin or Henderson would of defeated him IMHO.
Even back then, rankings didn't matter
Just like most of your repetitive posts.
IMHO He would have absolutely beat Anderson Silva in 2006.
Just like this repetitive topic
If you don't like it then don't post in it, you're only making more people see it. Since when is this a repetitive topic? There aren't many Matt Lindland threads.
I didn't say I didn't like anything. I'm just posting my opinion in an open forum
Rankings was the repetitive topic I was referring to, not Matt Linland.
Nooooo dont put him on a level with Chuck. Chuck was no doubt THE MAN at one point. Even if it was close between him, Wand, Rampage, Hendo etc as far as actual fighting skills, Chuck took this thing up at least 1 level. People loved watching Chuck fight, Lindland, not so much. Although I think Lindland is underrated and not as boring as people say. He fought like a greco based Ben Askren. He has good wins over Pat Miletich, Ivan Salaverry, Travis Lutter, Nino Schembri, Joe Doerkson, Baronix2, Mike Van Arsdale, Jeremy Horn, Carlos Newton. Many of those wins were finishes as well.