I was confused at first, but understood enough to realize that Jones popping a .29:1 T/E ratio was by far the most interesting fact to surface from this stew so far. So, I basically sacrificed an entire day of work to marinate on the issue and try and research it as best I could.
Step away from the scenario, and just consider it pragmatically. Jon Jones, a 27 year old combat sport champion, and freak athlete tested well below the 95th percentile on his testosterone to epitestosterone ratio; dangerously low in fact. His test represents a 70% drop from what is considered "normal". In comparison, removing your testicles would result in a 90% drop. I wonder what the "normal" ratio is for a 27 year old athlete? Is it 1:1 or closer to the legal limit of 4:1? I have no idea on this, but it does stand to reason that most premier athletes would land on the higher end of the normal range.
Now, this would be a little less incriminating if we were talking about a post-fight test. It isn't unusual for hormonal imbalances to occur after a grueling fight. This however, is from his December 4th OOC test, when he wasn't even fully involved in his camp...he was in Brazil attending a "seminar" just 4 days earlier.
According to medical professionals who are weighing in on the issue, there are only two scenarios that could result in this kind of result. 1. A rare problem with his endocrine system that affects testosterone production, or 2. A broad range of PED issues that include either coming off a cycle or using masking agents to raise E levels.
Which is more likely? That Jon Jones has a medical condition that results in testosterone production that falls below 95% of the world, and just isn't receiving treatment, or that he is involved with PED's?
It is also worth noting that the only other time I can recall a dangerously low T/E ratio coming up, in 20 years as a fan, was Alistair Overeem's post fight sample after the BF fight. This, his first fight back after serving a suspension for an OOC sample that indicated a 14:1 ratio...
No, none of this is proof, but it is incredibly compelling and certainly interesting.
What do you guys think? Logic can only take me to one place here.