So is it dangerous to say UFC 200 is not nearly as good as UFC 100 was?

Good god TS do you have no concern for our safety??


About on parr imo.
 
But as always proof is in the pudding.

198 should have been awesome but imo is sucked.
 
ufc 100 is overrated,and yeah man like its totally dangerous. the risks of saying this is very high oh yeah.
 
pretty safe to say that, even the ufc knows it's weak (for a milestone number card), why else do you think they would have had to get lesnar again? the only problem is that they couldn't get it sooner, it should have been the main event. the jones/cormier is long over. it was delay too much the first time and the first fight wasn't close.
 
It's pretty fucking good. Not everything has to be compared: the best ever, the greatest of all time, blah blah blah... just enjoy it.

It's also pretty pointless to do these comparisons as we're looking back on one with a biased perspective.
 
UFC 200 is the best card in MMA history

You guys are blinded by nostalgia
 
UFC 100 had the 2 biggest stars in the white gorilla and GSP. They also had greats like Dan, Jones, Bispings, Mir, Alves and Couture. What does UFC 100 offer that makes it better? Brock and GSP in their prime are better than the whole UFC 200 Card.

UFC 200 is better, than UFC 100 no comparison :)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,470
Messages
56,649,015
Members
175,333
Latest member
dubhlinn
Back
Top