So is it dangerous to say UFC 200 is not nearly as good as UFC 100 was?

[Number1StockBroker]

UFC 100 had the 2 biggest stars in the white gorilla and GSP. They also had greats like Dan, Jones, Bispings, Mir, Alves and Couture. What does UFC 100 offer that makes it better? Brock and GSP in their prime are better than the whole UFC 200 Card.

 

[ortizgnp]

I think 200 is fucking great.

It's a different era. That's all.

 

[theycallmeskidmarks]

dangerous?

 

[LouisBolanos]

It won't outsell UFC 100.

 

[BRASIL WAND]

The undercard for UFC 100 alone had:

Mark Coleman, Jon Jones, Stephan Bonnar, DHK, Jim Miller, CB Dollaway, Tom Lawlor, etc.


UFC 200 isnt even close... even if they had the Conor vs Nate nonsense again.

 

[AceCooch]

As stated, its a different era...

Yeah the undercard on 100 was great, but nobody fucking knew that Jon Jones would be the greatest of all time or that fighters like CB Dollaway and Jim Miller would have great careers after the fact...

You should wait until UFC 250 or so, and see how the current fighters careers have gone, and let it simmer, and then see how it compares.

 

[SirKratos]

People (including me) wanted an absolutely shocking freakshow fight for main event and it didn't happen. Retired legend vs. Current champ or something like that.

Other than that, I think its solid.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

It was the match ups that made ufc 100 so great as well. Alves looked like a tremendous challenge to GSP with his striking and his having been able to stay on his feet against Huges and Kos. And the Brock vs. Mir rematch was great on paper too, with Mir coming off of the upset over Nog, and Brock coming off of the upsets over Herring and Randy, and people not knowing how much his ground game had improved since the first fight, which so wild.

Plus, you had Hendo vs. Bisping which was a fun matchup after a TUF season, and you had Fitch vs. Thiago which was also highly anticipated.

UFC 200 is a solid card, but it is disappointing given the expectations set by UFC 100.

 

[yekmurat]

UFC 100 was an epic card...UFC 200 is a good card

 

[mjmj]

As mentioned, it’s all timing and circumstances. They’ve put together one of the best cards they could, with what they have to work with.

 

[UL]

The undercard for UFC 100 alone had:

Mark Coleman, Jon Jones, Stephan Bonnar, DHK, Jim Miller, CB Dollaway, Tom Lawlor, etc.


UFC 200 isnt even close... even if they had the Conor vs Nate nonsense again.

Coleman vs Bronnar was good

No one cared about Jones then, and lol at CB, Miller

Good fighters but not stars

 

[xGRIMREAPERx]

I agree but I think its up there. Definitely top 3

 

[evilbrent]

The undercard for UFC 100 alone had:

Mark Coleman, Jon Jones, Stephan Bonnar, DHK, Jim Miller, CB Dollaway, Tom Lawlor, etc.


UFC 200 isnt even close... even if they had the Conor vs Nate nonsense again.

I realize it is easy to say this now because those fighters, over the past 6/7 years have made huge names for themselves. But at the time, these guys were only up and coming fighters. With the exception of Coleman vs Bonnar. They always tend to have a solid fight to cap off the prelims. I mean, look at 198 for example.

 

[Iceman_Fan09]

I think 200 looks like a great card. I might even prefer 200's main card over 100's. It's especially tough to judge though because we can look at 100 in hindsight, whereas 200 hasn't happened yet (and there's apparently still fights to be announced for it).

 

[Dart Feld]

The power of hindsight.

 

[evilbrent]

They are adding (supposedly) another big fight on the card. If they do add something to the caliber that would push Hendricks vs Gastelum or Cain vs Browle to the undercard.. Geez, 200 >>>>> 100 IMO..

Also, it's a different era of fighting. What if Northcutt becomes the biggest star the UFC has ever seen by the time 300 hits? Them people are going to be saying "200>>>300 because Sage was on the undercard".. Kinda like how people are referencing Jones and 100.

Ya feel me?

 

[DorianGray]

UFC 100 had the 2 biggest stars in the white gorilla and GSP. They also had greats like Dan, Jones, Bispings, Mir, Alves and Couture. What does UFC 100 offer that makes it better? Brock and GSP in their prime are better than the whole UFC 200 Card.

what the fuck is with you and this phrasing? No it's not dangerous you moron. Go look up the definition of dangerous.

 

[Morphumax]

The undercard for UFC 100 alone had:

Mark Coleman, Jon Jones, Stephan Bonnar, DHK, Jim Miller, CB Dollaway, Tom Lawlor, etc.


UFC 200 isnt even close... even if they had the Conor vs Nate nonsense again.

Undercard for 200 blows 100 out of the water. 3 of these fights could easily headline a fight night.

 

[wartor]

It is not very dangerous. UFC 100 happened and it was great. 200 is great on paper, lets see what it looks like in real life.

 

[tarumady]

UFC 100 had the 2 biggest stars in the white gorilla and GSP. They also had greats like Dan, Jones, Bispings, Mir, Alves and Couture. What does UFC 100 offer that makes it better? Brock and GSP in their prime are better than the whole UFC 200 Card.

Dangerous? What is fuking dangerous you goof?
Maybe,maybe not,maybe f.. yourself