Their skills aren't even at all. Mendes is a very good, fast wrestler with mediocre stand up and solid GnP. Edgar is a good wrestler that proved his wrestling against much bigger and more accomplished fighters than what Mendes has faced outside of Aldo and has much better standup. If they fought Edgar would pick Mendes apart on their feet and they would probaly be either even in takedowns or Edgar would fare a little better since he's more creative in mixing his shot with punching combos (which is why he's had success against bigger guys like Gray and Benson). I've seen Edgar arguably beat Henderson which is something I cannot ever imagine seeing Mendes doing. Mendes isn't nearly as well rounded.
Mendes has outstanding top control and has very good defensive wrestling.
Just what has Edgar proved when wrestling those "more accomplished fighters"?
A TD establishing no control? Evidently, that approach was taken very lightly by the Judges in his last fights.
Defending a TD? Defensive "anything" is not a Scoring criteria.
Are you describing edgar's innocuous "bunch punching" and busy, busy striking style?
Even with a momentary knock down of Henderson, The Judging reflected the "not effective" consensus.
I like Frankie very much, but I'm not blind.
His fans fail to ask themselves "why was Edgar rewarded in Penn/Edgar 1 and Maynard/Edgar 2 for the same style that lost him the Henderson fights"?
The Judging criteria has changed. "Effective" is now the key word.
The fact is, Edgar Fans, Edgar lost twice to Ben. And if they fought again, and it was minute by minute the same as their second fight, Edgar would lose again.
Mendes has the ability to be MORE "effective" than Edgar. That is precisely why I would not take Mendes lightly when matched up against Edgar.