So if you're ahead on the score card, just poke the openent in the eye..

Ramificatio

Green Belt
@Green
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
4
..and the fight will be called for you. So if a fighter is ahead and starting to lose momentum, or feel exhaustion coming on, he could secure the win with an "accidental" eye poke?
 
Last edited:
yes, just like how you get two free groin shots
 
Bisping schooled Belcher.

A one sided fight characterized by a freak accident.

All the best to Alan. He's an entertainer and I enjoy his fights
 
Yep
Now fighters can take this road.
Win the first 2 and poke as hard as you can in the beginning of round 3
Will have the W and move on
 
Bisping schooled Belcher.

A one sided fight characterized by a freak accident.

All the best to Alan. He's an entertainer and I enjoy his fights

Easy tiger. Pretty sure he's talking about the Villante fight. Where it was pretty clear the tide was turning in Villante's favor before the poke.

I was one of the 9% who picked Villante too. Total bummer.
 
Easy tiger. Pretty sure he's talking about the Villante fight. Where it was pretty clear the tide was turning in Villante's favor before the poke.

I was one of the 9% who picked Villante too. Total bummer.

Right

Fair call.

Ref called that one a bit early didn't he?
 
The sad thing about this is that people will now start to believe that Bisping somehow got lucky in what was a dominant and well deserved win.

Technical decisions have been around for years. Deal with it.
 
..and the fight will be called for you. So if a fighter is ahead and starting to lose momentum, or feel exhaustion coming on, he could secure the win with an "accidental" eye poke?

I guess if you can fool the ref that it was unintentional

but if you change the rule to make every accidental strike that stops the fight a NC then everyone who is losing a fight would kick nuts and poke eyes
 
Butthurt Belcher fans. Bisping kicked his ass. Deal with it.
 
Intent is the be all and end all of these things.

They have to rein in on people doing what Rashad does with his patty cake, but if you poke a guy in the eye by accident, you shouldn't be punished.
 
The sad thing about this is that people will now start to believe that Bisping somehow got lucky in what was a dominant and well deserved win.

Technical decisions have been around for years. Deal with it.

Lol...peppering Belcher with weak ass strikes for 2.5 rounds is dominant now? Bisping clearly won that fight but there was nothing dominant about his performance.
 
It's a double-edged sword.

Right now they allow the technical decision. Like others have said, if Chael had accidentally injured Anderson with an eye poke in the 5th, apparently he would've won. That's not okay.

(That's just the first fight that comes to mind, so just think of a different one if the technical decision doesn't apply in 5 rounders.)

On the other hand, if situations like that always ended in a No Contest (or DQ if it was intentional, obviously), Anderson accidentally injuring Chael with an eye poke would rob Chael of what seemed like certain victory at that moment. That's even worse.

Either way you do it there will be potential for unfair situations, and for one guy or the other there is undeniably something to gain by committing a foul, even though it's unintentional. I don't think that any fighter who makes it to the UFC would be dirty enough to intentionally poke someone in the eye, but we can see that accidents happen, and it would be good to know that the person who fucked up wouldn't benefit from their mistake. Already they never take points for that stuff, so if it doesn't end the fight then they're getting the benefit of a slightly (sometimes significantly) impaired opponent.

The only way to remove any incentive to foul would be to treat it similarly to a failed drug test. If the injured fighter was winning on the cards, it goes on the record as a technical decision, and if they were losing then it's a No Contest. There's still potential for unfairness in that, so I'm not sure it's the answer.

In any case, I'd like to see a foul system implemented that deducts a percentage of the fighter's purse for stuff like that. It might not satisfy the fans to know that the only penalty would be behind the scenes, but if a fighter can lose 20% for missing weight, a poke in the eye or a kick to the groin should at least be worth 10%. And unlike that 20%, it should all go to the guy who just got his eye stabbed or his balls punted into his chest.
 
This is why MMA fans gripe about the rules. Belcher was unable to continue and yet they still did not take a point from Bisping. How many times are you allowed to illegally strike someone and get away with it? It's only fair if all fighters know beforehand they're allowed 2 or 3 eye pokes and one sort-of-intentional-but-maybe-it-wasn't groin shot.
 
..and the fight will be called for you. So if a fighter is ahead and starting to lose momentum, or feel exhaustion coming on, he could secure the win with an "accidental" eye poke?

Are we talking about Villante or Belcher's eye here?
 
Lol...peppering Belcher with weak ass strikes for 2.5 rounds is dominant now? Bisping clearly won that fight but there was nothing dominant about his performance.

Bisping landed about 90 significant strikes - must have been more than double what Belcher landed. Bisping constantly pushed him back and looked fresh until the end whereas Belcher could hardly even stand in the third round. Definitely a dominant win.
 
The problem wasn't the rule, it was the ref. that guy was missing shit the entire fight. He was probably feeling a bit of pressure given his crappy performance to that point and in the heat of the moment he just plain fucked up.
 
The OSP - Villante fight never should've been called. Villante should have been given time to recover. It ended up looking like OSP got a lucky win, even though OSP has a history of kicking things up a notch in round three. For whatever reason, OSP often gives up round two. Now we don't know who would've won between the two had round three been more than 33 seconds thanks to an idiot ref.


And in Bisping-Belcher's case, Belcher looked like utter crap from bell to poke, where Bisping looked better than ever. I somehow doubt that we were robbed of anything in that battle.
 
Back
Top