Siver took down Connor 2 times

He didn't take Conor down. He came close but he didn't complete the takedown.
 
yeah I checked it also maybe they dont count as TD but I think they showed to take Conor down is not a big deal...

So by not being taken down, Conor showed crappy take down defense and could get easily taken down...Am I right?

Nice backwards logic.
 
He focuses more on getting back up than TDD itself.

It's certainly a workable strategy, but it will be interesting when he finally fights a wrestler.
 
Fightmetric is useless

Connor was standing

siver took him to the ground 3 times

Connor escaped

still = 3 takedowns
 
Conor is throwing repeated reckless tornado kicks like he's messing around with a heavy bag before practice, gets sort of taken down before immediately getting to his feet like he's climbing out of bed, all while eviscerating his opponent, and his haters somehow find hope in this.
 
So what siver has better wrestling than lamas. He took down gray as well
 
Siver took him down, he popped right back up tho.
 
Fightmetric is useless

Connor was standing

siver took him to the ground 3 times

Connor escaped

still = 3 takedowns

This is why legitimate discussion is so hard here. THOSE WERE NOT COMPLETED TAKEDOWNS. You can't just decide they are.

Siver attempted three and Conor defended three.

You can't just say, "Forget the stats and the definition of takedowns...HE TOOK HIM DOWN!"
 
Fightmetric is useless

Connor was standing

siver took him to the ground 3 times

Connor escaped

still = 3 takedowns

This is why people get robbed in fights when people like yourself view that as a takedown. It was nothing. An irrelevant aspect of the fight.
 
Back
Top