- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 42,438
- Reaction score
- 20,355
Shows like The Rachel Maddow Show have argued in court successfully that they are not telling facts and are just entertainment. However it's pretty obvious people watch these types of shows and believe they are getting the news. They present themselves as providing real information to the American public while arguing another thing in court. Wouldn't it make sense to air a disclaimer before the show letting the audience know it is not based on fact? Similar to how South Park does.
Judge Opinion:
"On one hand, a viewer who watches news channels tunes in for facts and the goings-on of the world. MSNBC indeed produces news, but this point must be juxtaposed with the fact that Maddow made the allegedly defamatory statement on her own talk show news segment where she is invited and encouraged to share her opinions with her viewers. Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.
Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact"
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers
Judge Opinion:
"On one hand, a viewer who watches news channels tunes in for facts and the goings-on of the world. MSNBC indeed produces news, but this point must be juxtaposed with the fact that Maddow made the allegedly defamatory statement on her own talk show news segment where she is invited and encouraged to share her opinions with her viewers. Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.
Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact"
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers