What i was thinking was that as a fighter gets older or suffers an injury, it would be better to gravitate towards a grappling or grappling-based style. I think that grappling sports (BJJ, Judo, Wrestling, etc) can be implemented to a longer extent (age-wise) and that is proven by the existence of Masters/Veterans divisions in those sports.
In a MMA context it wouldn't be that simple but i think the basic principal can still stand. A pure striker might not be able to become a master grappler/submission artist but adding more clinching, for example, can be beneficial since they will nullify the younger and (probably) faster striker. When it comes to grapplers it would be easier since they can use their experience and their skills.
Do you guys think fighters should change/adapt or stick to their strengths even if they start to decline in some areas?
In a MMA context it wouldn't be that simple but i think the basic principal can still stand. A pure striker might not be able to become a master grappler/submission artist but adding more clinching, for example, can be beneficial since they will nullify the younger and (probably) faster striker. When it comes to grapplers it would be easier since they can use their experience and their skills.
Do you guys think fighters should change/adapt or stick to their strengths even if they start to decline in some areas?