Should Mcgregor have been disqualified against Poirier for the back of the head shots?

[CombatScience]

When Mcgregor fought Dustin Poirier, he dropped him with a straight left, then preceded to punch him in the back of the head 2-3 times, which is what really stopped him. Last time I checked back of the head shots were illegal.

Should he have been disqualified?

 

[Weidman]

 

[Flex Plexico]

Lookit all that damage!!

Jeez

 

[Chronicsonic]

lol classic

 

[Chris John]

If it makes you feel better, then yes.

 

[Stained Class]

He should have been disqualified in every fight because he's a gutless fraud. Strip him, and close this dark chapter of UFC history.

The sooner he goes away completely. The better it is for the legitimacy of the UFC. Dana, too.

 

[DLX]

looks like a regular old pea head to me. He needs to learn how to take losses better and stop making excuses.

 

[Weidman]

looks like a regular old pea head to me. He needs to learn how to take losses better and stop making excuses.

That's actually Bigfoot

 

[DLX]

That's actually Bigfoot

oh... Well I take back what I said. Good luck in your next fight, Dustin

 

[ZuffaExecutive]

When Mcgregor fought Dustin Poirier, he dropped him with a straight left, then preceded to punch him in the back of the head 2-3 times, which is what really stopped him. Last time I checked back of the head shots were illegal.

Should he have been disqualified?

They were legal shots it was to the side of the back of the head,its basically just the small soft part that is illegal

 

[Skarsgard]

Even if they were to the back of the head, no. Poirier was done the second he hit the mat.

 

[Jay philips]