should Condit have faced Matt Brown before title shot vs Lawler ?

[alexxx]

I feel we as fans should have seen this fight


condit could have waited until after browns fight vs tim means, and it would have been perfect .... you guys agree?

 

[Pwent]

He shouldve beat someone relevant

The two guys fighting for #1 contender both beat him

 

[soulsstealer]

condit is probably going to lose and fight brown after.

 

[Mr. Hammer]

There's a very valid argument against Condit getting this shot, BUT...

Who was a better choice? Woodley probably wouldn't fight Lawler and nobody on planet earth except for Hendricks fans wants to see Lawler/Hendricks 3.

 

[sss133]

Probably should have. However being that the UFC needed an action packed card for their first Melbourne card the Lawler Condit fight makes sense.

Had they done Lawler Hendrcks 3 in Melbourne and Hendricks did what he did in 2, because Australia isn't a wrestling country they would have boo'd them out of the building.

 

[DatSamboKid]

Absolutely. It was perfect timing to see that fight, disappointed it didn't happen.

 

[Substance Abuse]

Condit should fight Matt Brown every three months in a 5 round Fight Night headliner, best of seven series.

 

[tat2man5k]

There's a very valid argument against Condit getting this shot, BUT...

Who was a better choice? Woodley probably wouldn't fight Lawler and nobody on planet earth except for Hendricks fans wants to see Lawler/Hendricks 3.

Best possible answer, IMO

 

[Hankooks]

Condit should fight Matt Brown every three months in a 5 round Fight Night headliner, best of seven series.

I'd sign up for this. Hopefully Condit beats Lawler and brown can get his shitle tot after another win. A win over rory would do it and I'd favor him.

 

[alexxx]

Condit should fight Matt Brown every three months in a 5 round Fight Night headliner, best of seven series.

I like your brain

 

[bosox32]

It was the most exciting appealing matchup to make. I'm fine with it.