- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 929
- Reaction score
- 0
that's what I see happening too.
Those two fight again tomorrow I think most people are gonna pick rda he was looking good till he got clippedJust like how people were saying Alvarez had nothing for RDA because he was supposed to be 0-3.
No. Chuck was a counter-striker. Lawler is a brawler.
Context doesn't matter, he finished that fight. Condit? Sure, but he definitively beat Rory.Thanks for grabbing the one thing you saw you didn't agree with but didn't take the context with it.
Lol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?
Well Chuck had a pretty similar fighting style to Lawler, fierce chin to back it up. And then one day it was just completely and totally gone.
I don't understand why so many people are counting out Woodley when Robbie could have been 0-3 in his last 3.
He lost to Hendricks.
Was going to a toss up decision before Rory's nose exploded. I had it 2-2 going into the fifth.
Condit fight was one of worst gifted decisions ever.
Didn't read the article, but...Lol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?
I don't understand why so many people are counting out Woodley when Robbie could have been 0-3 in his last 3.
He lost to Hendricks.
Was going to a toss up decision before Rory's nose exploded. I had it 2-2 going into the fifth.
Condit fight was one of worst gifted decisions ever.
He had Shevchenko over Holm via unanimous decision
Lawlor has been rocked and just about everyone of his UFC fights. Woodley hits like a freight train.Lol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?