- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 9,944
- Reaction score
- 0
Lol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?
Lawler and Woodley are tacticians. They benefit from strategic minds in the corner, but when the fight picks up, both men tend to go with the flow, reacting to the fight as it unfolds. Lately, this trait has proven problematic for Lawler. Despite possessing a beautiful jab and a dizzying array of combinations, Lawler all but shut down in his fight with Condit, essentially waiting for the one big shot that would end the fight. That could have been a reaction to Condit’s volume, and Lawler could come out looking renewed with a patient tactician like Woodley in front of him; or it could presage a sudden decline for the late-in-life welterweight champ. This is as much a gut pick as anything, but every fighter hits the point of no return sooner or later; and with a puncher like Woodley, who has consistently refined his game over the past few years, Lawler will not have the luxury of a comfortable adjustment period. The pick is Woodley by first-round knockout.
Read more at http://www.sherdog.com/news/articles/1/Preview-UFC-201-Lawler-vs-Woodley-109109#j8DTUXF55wBbfpks.99
He also took Ed Herman which IMO is a way bigger upset.Lol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?
He had Shevchenko over Holm via unanimous decisionLol. Does anyone take these predictions in consideration for betting decisions?
This doesn't make sense. How was it almost 0-3 if he finished Rory? No decision but a TKO.I don't understand why so many people are counting out Woodley when Robbie could have been 0-3 in his last 3.
He lost to Hendricks.
Was going to a toss up decision before Rory's nose exploded. I had it 2-2 going into the fifth.
Condit fight was one of worst gifted decisions ever.
Chris Leben as well. You can only depend on your chin for offense so long. They don't last in this game.Well Chuck had a pretty similar fighting style to Lawler, fierce chin to back it up. And then one day it was just completely and totally gone.
Thanks for grabbing the one thing you saw you didn't agree with but didn't take the context with it.This doesn't make sense. How was it almost 0-3 if he finished Rory? No decision but a TKO.
Well Chuck had a pretty similar fighting style to Lawler, fierce chin to back it up. And then one day it was just completely and totally gone.
I don't understand why so many people are counting out Woodley when Robbie could have been 0-3 in his last 3.
He lost to Hendricks.
Was going to a toss up decision before Rory's nose exploded. I had it 2-2 going into the fifth.
Condit fight was one of worst gifted decisions ever.