Sex Robot Brothels - Weird double standard? A cure for incels?

Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. So why isn't selling fucking legal?

#Carlin

cause religious conservatives can't even put up with a woman breastfeeding in public so why would you think they'd support the selling of fucking?
 
If there is a good way for law enforcement to be out in front of child sex trafficking I don't get why we don't just legalize sex work on the whole. It'd make it fucking safer for all parties involved the same way making pot legal has made that safer for the end user ultimately.
 
I am normally out in left field on things like this, and typically would say, 'Knock yourself out if that's your thing'.

But I advise caution. I think this might open the door to normalizing behaviors 'with dolls' that would horrify society.

I noticed in this article that they specifically mentioned not making the dolls resemble children.



I think this would be one of the first things that would fall by the wayside, and could lead to some unintended consequences.

I think the big question here is, is it OK to do things that would "horrify society"? The answer seems to be, increasingly, yes. Half of this forum is probably watching Mexican smurf on donkey porn between episodes of Game of Thrones and, when they're done, play a game which simulates running over pedestrians in the street before watching two people get into a ring and beat each other to a pulp. The ship has sailed on things that would "horrify society" being acceptable long ago. The more interesting question is, why do you draw the line here when any number of us participate in any number of things that would "horrify society" not long ago, and in some cases, probably still do? We feel completely entitled to horrify society when it suits our purposes. So - and this is a serious question - why do we draw the line here about horrifying society?
 
I think the big question here is, is it OK to do things that would "horrify society"? The answer seems to be, increasingly, yes. Half of this forum is probably watching Mexican smurf on donkey porn between episodes of Game of Thrones and, when they're done, play a game which simulates running over pedestrians in the street before watching two people get into a ring and beat each other to a pulp. The ship has sailed on things that would "horrify society" being acceptable long ago. The more interesting question is, why do you draw the line here when any number of us participate in any number of things that would "horrify society" not long ago, and in some cases, probably still do? We feel completely entitled to horrify society when it suits our purposes. So - and this is a serious question - why do we draw the line here about horrifying society?
Fucking kids, or objects that look like kids should 100% never be OK.

I don't care if it's a fucking sex robot that shit is still fucked cause you know that person given the chance would fuck an actual child at that stage.

Blood Eagle, for all of them, publicly in the public square.
 
I support the idea if you close the door behind them, and don't let them out.
 
Fucking people of the same sex, or objects that look like people of the same sex should 100% never be OK.

I just edited your post to a view that looks like what someone from even a few decades ago would have said, with societal consent and backing, which also reflects the Western standard of human history. I wonder what Grampa Gregolian, who would have perhaps uttered your edited post, would be saying today? And more to the point, what would it matter? On top of that, many cultures - including the cornerstone culture of Western society - would have read what you originally posted and said "But what's the big deal?"

We all like to pretend like our moral standards, the standards of the time we live in, represent some sort of moral realist absolute. We also like to pretend that consensus on our side, in a given historical moment, matters in the long term. The reality is that we're a bit of cultural tweaking and a generation or two away from celebrating what we now consider to be the greatest sin. Declare it all you want, demand the perpetrators have their genitals cut off, whatever, it doesn't change that myopic views declaring moral absolutism are so much dust that blows away in the face of cultural forces far beyond them. You and your views will likely amount to less than nothing in decades to come and, while I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news in the face of such passion, that's just the way it is.
 
I think the big question here is, is it OK to do things that would "horrify society"? The answer seems to be, increasingly, yes. Half of this forum is probably watching Mexican smurf on donkey porn between episodes of Game of Thrones and, when they're done, play a game which simulates running over pedestrians in the street before watching two people get into a ring and beat each other to a pulp. The ship has sailed on things that would "horrify society" being acceptable long ago. The more interesting question is, why do you draw the line here when any number of us participate in any number of things that would "horrify society" not long ago, and in some cases, probably still do? We feel completely entitled to horrify society when it suits our purposes. So - and this is a serious question - why do we draw the line here about horrifying society?

There are 3 'leaps' we need to be mindful of IMO. The first leap is merely watching. Then the leap between watching and passively participating. And finally the leap between passively participating and actively doing.

We crossed the first leap thousands of years ago. With technology we have already crossed the second leap in many areas. And the day is not long off from a technological standpoint, that we will be able to actively do to an extremely lifelike humanoid form whatever the fuck we want, assuming no legal parameters.

Personally, that 3rd leap-doing things to very lifelike human surrogates- is where we should pay the most attention. We would want to avoid normalizing sexual behavior towards minors and killing people in violent ways.

Unless you go to one of those furry conventions, you will not soon get to be a Mexican smurf fucking a donkey.

But make a 'Robot kiddie brothel' legal and I think sooner or later you are going to see a real life escalation of that behavior.

And what happens when 'laser tag' evolves into something truly realistic where you can go into a retail shopping mall and bludgeon extremely lifelike homo sapien robots for fun?

That is what is on my mind.
 
Last edited:
10 years from now:

What are you studying in college?


I am majoring in mechanical pussy design with a minor in waste fluid management
 
No robots and sex workers arent going to do shit for incels because those people are sick and think woman should throw themselves at them and the rage comes from what they think should happen and reality not meshing real well
 
No robots and sex workers arent going to do shit for incels because those people are sick and think woman should throw themselves at them and the rage comes from what they think should happen and reality not meshing real well
See: Elliot Rogers.
 
All hail the clever mind o' Man!

But really, this is just sad.
 
I just edited your post to a view that looks like what someone from even a few decades ago would have said, with societal consent and backing, which also reflects the Western standard of human history. I wonder what Grampa Gregolian, who would have perhaps uttered your edited post, would be saying today? And more to the point, what would it matter? On top of that, many cultures - including the cornerstone culture of Western society - would have read what you originally posted and said "But what's the big deal?"

We all like to pretend like our moral standards, the standards of the time we live in, represent some sort of moral realist absolute. We also like to pretend that consensus on our side, in a given historical moment, matters in the long term. The reality is that we're a bit of cultural tweaking and a generation or two away from celebrating what we now consider to be the greatest sin. Declare it all you want, demand the perpetrators have their genitals cut off, whatever, it doesn't change that myopic views declaring moral absolutism are so much dust that blows away in the face of cultural forces far beyond them. You and your views will likely amount to less than nothing in decades to come and, while I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news in the face of such passion, that's just the way it is.
Are you seriously conflating fucking children, a group of society that the governments of the world have deemed unable of understanding what consent even is... is the same as two consenting adults sleeping with each other?
 
Are you seriously conflating fucking children, a group of society that the governments of the world have deemed unable of understanding what consent even is... is the same as two consenting adults sleeping with each other?

No. I do not believe there are any true equivalences so I will never present any two things as entirely equivalent - which I did not do in this case, I might add. Is your response to try and drag me into some moral straw man which does not even remotely resemble the case I've presented? If so, we're done here. I have no time for intellectual dishonesty, even if it is driven by a genuine and passionate desire to do right
 
No. I do not believe there are any true equivalences so I will never present anything as entirely equivalent, which I did not do in this case. Is your response to try and drag me into some moral straw man which does not even remotely resemble the case I've presented? If so, we're done here. I have no time for intellectual dishonesty, even if it is driven by a genuine and passionate desire to do right
Not trying to morally strawman but I think it's ridiculous that people are "ok" essentially with the idea of children fucking becoming normal.

That's fucked.

EDIT:
To add, it's a fucking Class A or Class B felony in all states in the US if we want to talk about a specific country. This isn't even a moral argument, fucking children is straight up illegal in the Western world.
 
Back
Top