"No plan" is Trump in a nutshell. Very dangerous being the head of the most powerful country in the world and not have a plan.
I don't see it as Clinton = boiling frogOf course anarchy is dangerous. I don't think I am giving Trump any kind of compliment by calling him the anarchy candidate.
The question is am I right in calling Clinton the boiling frog candidate, and is anarchy preferable to a boiling pot?
I don't see it as Clinton = boiling frog
I see it as Clinton = steady predictable capable but corrupt and boring
And Trump = wild card racist brash unpredictable embarrassment corrupt unprofessional dangerous demogouge etc etc etc
I hate that weasely little unfunny fuck
I might a little later gonna eat then go to store I owe my son $15 for allowance and he's bugging to spend it lolFair enough.
You should follow me over to my thread I made on this, and give me an honest debate on the merits of my position and yours.
It would be helpful to engage with someone I know won't just start throwing strawman arguments.
If you were forced to watch an hour of one of the current late night comedy talk hosts, who would it be?
Kimmel
Fallon
O'Brien
Colbert
Meyers
Corden
For me it's a toss up between O'Brien and Colbert.
Conan and only the monologue, skits, or guests I like. I can't stand the pandering. I understand that the nature of the type of show means they kinda have to be that way. not every guest has an amazing show or fantastic movie role. I mean he can't say hey tonight we have Jimmy mcfaggotpants from his new movie that's just ok. hey here's hipsterband with their new shitty song!If you were forced to watch an hour of one of the current late night comedy talk hosts, who would it be?
Kimmel
Fallon
O'Brien
Colbert
Meyers
Corden
For me it's a toss up between O'Brien and Colbert.
Not a fan of telling people how to vote or what to do, but at this point one would wonder what the true hardcore Sander's supporters want? Short of him being President (which he didn't have the votes for in the primary) what is their goal? Taking down Hillary and supplementing another candidate? Waiting it out and trying to divide the Democratic vote even more? The DNC screwing Sanders over is a legitimate issue, but what would be the endgame in pursuing it? A fairer, cleaner system? Totally for it, but good luck. That was partially Sander's reasoning for running, and more people voted for establishment and practicality than new and idealistic.I thought the left doesn't use fear in order to get people to vote for them?
I think you miss the analogy entirely. It is we the people that are the boiling frog. We are for dinner.With a boiling frog you know whats for dinner with anarchy you're not sure what you're eating until it's in your mouth and it's too late.
Yeah i saw that afterwards thnx thoI think you miss the analogy entirely. It is we the people that are the boiling frog. We are for dinner.
Conan and only the monologue, skits, or guests I like. I can't stand the pandering. I understand that the nature of the type of show means they kinda have to be that way. not every guest has an amazing show or fantastic movie role. I mean he can't say hey tonight we have Jimmy mcfaggotpants from his new movie that's just ok. hey here's hipsterband with their new shitty song!
Both the left and the right like to claim things that aren't true.
But you're asking the wrong person, I'm neither.
Not a fan of telling people how to vote or what to do, but at this point one would wonder what the true hardcore Sander's supporters want? Short of him being President (which he didn't have the votes for in the primary) what is their goal? Taking down Hillary and supplementing another candidate? Waiting it out and trying to divide the Democratic vote even more? The DNC screwing Sanders over is a legitimate issue, but what would be the endgame in pursuing it? A fairer, cleaner system? Totally for it, but good luck. That was partially Sander's reasoning for running, and more people voted for establishment and practicality than new and idealistic.
I think if someone is a democrat and doesn't want Trump, the logical choice would be to close their eyes, grit their teeth and go Shillary. I don't see the (lack of) mobilization for a third party candidate doing them any favors in that regard.
This is to say, Seth may sound like a pompous douchebag because he is, indeed, a pompous douchebag. But here, he's not completely asinine.
"No plan" is Hillary in a nutshell. Very dangerous being the head of the most powerful country in the world and being blackmailed by Russia/China/Hackers.
Simply put, supporting Hillary means you condone the DNC corruption against their own party. Voting against them the best way of telling them can't can't get away with it. This is why I think party affiliation is a sham, corrupt is corrupt