I have seen a lot folks just make quick or snarky comments on this question either way. But I am wondering seriously what people think here and why. Putting biases aside as much as we can, what are the arguments on both sides? I tend to think Weidman is just better than any version Anderson. He is just more skilled in more areas, regardless of age. The AS that destroyed Franklin still loses to Weidman. I just do not see evidence that Anderson was significantly declining going into the Weidman fights. But would like to hear well-designed opinions on either side.