Sherk was pretty good at the end of his career imo. Had crisp jabs and combination punches, despite his short reach he connected often enough. Tyson Griffin fight was a fantastic fight, same with Frankie Edgar, both mainly striking but had ground elements as well. He had hell of a chin.
Sean Sherk did beat Nick in a boxing match. His fanboys don't like to admit it, but even Nick knows he lost that fight.
It haunts him, why else would he bring it up in his post speech?
That wasn't what Nick was saying. What he was saying was he landed more punches against Sherk but Sherk pushed forward the whole time = Sherk won
Then he pushes forward the whole time in this fight and doesn't win
So he's like WTF judges?
Did you guys seriously not get that that was the point he was making?