How?
10-8 Tate in 3rd & McMann 10-9 first two?
I had it 29-28 for Tate, but could see a 10-8 for #3
I am re-watching Tate/RR 2 now & it makes me wonder how many will root for Tate over Ronda like last time?
I forgot how the crowd was so pro-Tate.
10-8 Sara first round, 10-8 Tate 3rd with the 2nd being really close.
I start to really dislike her.
She got hurt on the feet vs tate, she got outwrestled by Tate, she failed to display any ground game against Lauren Murphey, she got bullied in the clinch by Ronda and knocked out in the first, she was subbed by baszler in a grappling tournament, she has no significant wins in her entire career but for some reason she and some fans think she's an elite fighter because she won a silver medal in a different sport a decade ago.
Nailed it with NO significant wins. She lost to Baszler and they robbed Baszler. Yet every time she fights she is a big favorite. 2/1 dog on Nunes? How dumb is the mma betting public?
Was McMann a favorite over Tate?
No way was Rd.1 a 10-8
I like ya man, but no way lol
Miesha didn't do much of anything in that round.
One Sherdog judge gave the first round a 10-8 to Sara, as well.
http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/UFC-183-Results-Silva-vs-Diaz-PlaybyPlay-Updates-80853
MMA junkie says round 2 was "hard to score" but gave it to Tate.
http://mmajunkie.com/2015/01/ufc-183-play-by-play-and-live-results
Miesha got very lucky in that decision. Even one of the official judges scored it a Draw.
She didn't get lucky
Most people had her winning
If McMann won than it would be lucky since most had her losing a close fight
When most people score a fight in one direction it is a justified win ... not lucky
Agreed that the RR McMann stoppage sucked. Herb is the worse ref in all of MMA.
I just re-watched McMann/RR (I had a free minute lol) & while I understand it, I do think it was a fast stoppage.
Nope. Fight easily could have swung either way.
Rewatched it and thought the same thing again.
This coming from a guy that likes them both and met Miesha at the UFC 136 expo.
I agree 100%. She was in trouble but that's part of MMA at times. If I wasn't a Tate fan I'd say something like "I wish she'd beaten Miesha" so we could see it again. McMann needs to concentrate on her business and try and make that title a part of it again.
This is why fighters need either someone in P.R. or at least a friend with common sense to review their media comments. Not only Sarah lost to Tate who is on a 4 fight win streak, 3 of them top ten opponents, the UFC is trying to add this fight to Aldo/Conor to make one of the highest PPVs ever. And she is going to come and tell people "what's the point?" I am sure the UFC is thrilled she is trying to shit of half their PPV.
And considering Tate took Rousey to three rounds in their last fight and the last 4 opponents made in just over 2 minutes COMBINED, Tate certainly has the best chance. Will Ronda beat her again? I'd be shocked if she doesn't. But Tate earned her shot again and Sarah seems to be looking to fuck up her own career. Sometimes saying nothing is best.
Well when you lose to Miesha, you tend to get behind her not in front of her for a TS.
Bc it's a stupid comment. Ufc brass tends to notice stupid comments and thier all ready setting this fight up and Sara is dissing them for it. Meisha has won 4 in a row, beat Sara along the way and is clearly deserving of a title shot.
Only I part I agree with is the fact Meisha can fight Ronda 100 times and will lose everytime. But she's earned it, Sara has not.
Ya got me?
lmao it's a stupid comment to suggest it's silly a fighter who's 0-2 against the champ and showed 0 competitiveness in either fight, is getting a 3rd shot? are you delusional?