- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,769
- Reaction score
- 22
Yes.You saying they should submit their articles to Clinton before posting?
That's exactly what I'm saying.
Why did you bother to post that drivel?
Yes.You saying they should submit their articles to Clinton before posting?
This has been widely reported. I posted a link already.
See above. I don't think anyone is saying that the Trump people had a hand in it. Just that Putin thinks he can control Trump (and is already showings signs of it, as demonstrated by the platform fight and Trump's comments about NATO and about the U.S. not having the moral standing to criticize other countries) and wants him to win so he's helping.
They sabotaged it so much that over 3 million more voters voted for her. Give me a break.
Thing is, Putin certainly sees Trump as someone he can manipulate.
And maybe it's some Russian dude that did this.
But as a State action?
This accusation comes off as irresponsible desperate, and if it is shown to be unfounded, Clinton should have the stones to do what Trump couldn't, and chop a head or two.
I love how some are trying to push the notion that the source of the leaked e-mails, is somehow more important than the content within them.
Unless the e-mails were doctored, it doesn't matter where they came from.
That's stupid. The Russian intelligence services have access to far more sensitive information (Clinton's emails for ex) that the stupid emails of the DNC political hacks.
"My team likes to cheat and circumvent the rules, but it's cool because we would win anyway"
Thanks for being a textbook example of a Hillary voter, and further illustrating my point.
Bernie want beating Clinton. Period. That's it. The emails were stupid don't kid yourself. He wasn't winning.
Thing is, Putin certainly sees Trump as someone he can manipulate.
I can see what you mean.Nah. Trump is a loose cannon. He's proud and unpredictable. I'm sure Putin prefers a morally elastic, no-principles Hillary.
Once again, Thanks for being a textbook example of a Hillary voter, and further illustrating my point.
I can see what you mean.
I think Putin prefers an egotistical, monomaniacal leader with no political background, who's expressed admiration for dictators.
Between the two, Putin undoubtedly sees Trump as someone he can whisper sweet nothings to impress.
In my lifetime, I never thought I'd see the return of the Russian strongman, but especially not admiration for it.Putin and Trump are similar in some ways, true. They're strong leaders contemptuous of political correctness, and both have vision and clear plans for their countries. Hillary has no vision and no convictions.
I'm not convinced that the US necessarily have to be on bad terms with Putin/Russia.
It's tinfoil hat stuff.A couple weeks ago, you guys said that Trump was going to be trash at foreign policy, and couldn't work with other world leaders. Now you are saying they are conspiring to get him to the whitehouse?
In my lifetime, I never thought I'd see the return of the Russian strongman, but especially not admiration for it.
Jesus.
I didn't vote for her. I'm just anti-Mussolini.