People say that Ronda strayed from her game in the Holm fight and yet she did try to initiate a clinch, Holly managed to stifle the clinch game and keep it standing. People want to take away credit from Holly by saying Ronda screwed up rather than Holly figured out how to win. Watch the break down done by Firas after the fight to see how Holly stopped the throws.
Good points for Amanda are that she is large and strong like Holly, if she did her homework and is able to put on a solid plan as Holly did, she could get the finish with her heavy hands. Bad point is her cardio has shown to be a problem in past fights and she does not seem to be the counter striking styled fighter that Holly is which could mean far more clinch opportunity for Ronda.
Good points for Ronda is she is a beast in a scramble so if she can get it to the floor she has a shot, I also think her cardio is better. Bad points for Ronda are the layoff, the last loss being a knockout could be a problem when facing a heavy handed fighter, and the mystique being shattered to a point which means people are going to be far less tense about facing Ronda being that they have seen her lose and understand that her skills don't need to be matched to be stopped.
The three big elements for me are, how does Ronda react if Nunes lands a few bombs on her, what if Nunes can neutralize the clinch, and if the fight goes more than three rounds can Nunes keep the pace?
If Nunes didn't appear to be so strong, I would probably guess that she would get thrown right away. Being the more recently active fighter and having the momentum I am going to go with Nunes getting those heavy hands on Ronda and putting her away early.