- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 55,882
- Reaction score
- 27,130
Don't you guys agree?
He probably is. Hillary is not half the candidate he had to go up against.
Would take Romney over Trump any day. In fact, this election is really making me appreciate how good we had it in 2012... which is crazy as fuck because I hated both Romney and Obama. I'd take either over Hillary or Trump.
Would take Romney over Trump any day. In fact, this election is really making me appreciate how good we had it in 2012... which is crazy as fuck because I hated both Romney and Obama. I'd take either over Hillary or Trump.
Fucking Bloomberg? That prick would have been terrible.In all fairness, I would take almost any two combination of people over Trump and Hillary.
Out of the list of "potential" candidates, my preference would have been for Paul Ryan vs. Bloomberg. While I'm not a Republican, I actually think Ryan is the type of moderate that could bring about a better America.
Fucking Bloomberg? That prick would have been terrible.
In all fairness, I would take almost any two combination of people over Trump and Hillary.
Out of the list of "potential" candidates, my preference would have been for Paul Ryan vs. Bloomberg. While I'm not a Republican, I actually think Ryan is the type of moderate that could bring about a better America.
I think it is amazing the effect Trump has had to make someone think that Ryan is a moderate.In all fairness, I would take almost any two combination of people over Trump and Hillary.
Out of the list of "potential" candidates, my preference would have been for Paul Ryan vs. Bloomberg. While I'm not a Republican, I actually think Ryan is the type of moderate that could bring about a better America.
Well, I would be a bold faced liar if I said that I knew alot about Ryan's position or views prior to this campaign (only what I could glean from Canadian news - which isn't much). After his recent appointment, he struck me as someone who seemed to want to address the bi-partisan posturing and work towards solutions. What his track record is in "walking the walk" behind those statements remains a mystery to me.
Well, I would be a bold faced liar if I said that I knew alot about Ryan's position or views prior to this campaign (only what I could glean from Canadian news - which isn't much). After his recent appointment, he struck me as someone who seemed to want to address the bi-partisan posturing and work towards solutions. What his track record is in "walking the walk" behind those statements remains a mystery to me.
no… Every interview would be asking about the rights they would take from women and the oppression of the LGBTQRSTUV community. The media would not just roll over. Plus they would be more hawkish and pro-NAFTA which means there would be zero Sanders voters crossing over. The narrative would be how we can finally have a woman president, and in the end it would be a wash…I dont see the Republicans winning back the white house unless they chance some things. This year they would have had a realistic chance with someone like Romeny or maybe Paul Ryan. But thats only because of Hillary. If the democrats had a candidate like Biden or Kerry run it would have been the same sort of easy victory Obama had in 2012.
Would take Romney over Trump any day. In fact, this election is really making me appreciate how good we had it in 2012... which is crazy as fuck because I hated both Romney and Obama. I'd take either over Hillary or Trump.
Obama is the worst president ever.
Romney is good but I think being a mormon fucking kills him in the presidential race.