• Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to its more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Rolling Submissions?

eaglewrestler27

White Belt
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Being agile and having good body awareness is essential in grappling arts, and a lot of my practices are started w/ forward and backwards rolls.
My questions is what submissions in particular rely on this movement?
1. Rolling kneebar (obviously)
2. Reverse omoplata
3. any others?
 
you can roll into a triangle if your in the bottom in side control... you can roll for the armbar aswell, over the head like fedor vs coleman
 
Awesome replies... anymore examples like fedor vs coleman would be appreciated.

I ask because i freestyle wrestled for years , and find myself very comfortable w/ rolling (literally). I was practicing the reverse omoplata today and hit it fairly cleanly. I would like to add more rolling subs to my arsenal, so anymore examples or videos would be appreciated.
************EDIT***************
The Coleman vs Fedor was not a rolling armbar, Fedor just swings from open guard to a regular armbar.... i wouldn't call that a rolling armbar.
 
e04it5.gif


aurelio is just so fucking awesome.
 
************EDIT***************
The Coleman vs Fedor was not a rolling armbar, Fedor just swings from open guard to a regular armbar.... i wouldn't call that a rolling armbar.
you probably watched the 2nd fight.

snny89.gif


i'd call this one rolling.
 
fair enough. but you can't really call fedor's armbar on coleman a regular armbar from the guard either.

Meh, yeah I probably would. It's just your normal armbar, Coleman postured, and Fedor switched to the bellydown variation. The difference between what I posted and what you posted is Eddie's move was rolling because his opponent was stationary. Fedor's move was "rolling" because Coleman reacted and moved.
 
Meh, yeah I probably would. It's just your normal armbar, Coleman postured, and Fedor switched to the bellydown variation. The difference between what I posted and what you posted is Eddie's move was rolling because his opponent was stationary. Fedor's move was "rolling" because Coleman reacted and moved.

it just comes down to how you define rolling. for me, if a guy actually rolls to get the move, its a rolling sub. but you can have it any way you want to.
 
Back
Top