RIP Josh Trank's career 1984-2016

TheStruggle

Yellow Card
Banned
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
28,152
Reaction score
2
....


I'm not sure if this man is actually dead but he sure as hell murdered his career last year when he slammed the studios days before Fantastic Four release and hasn't been linked to another project since.

Talk about a fall from grace.
 
Second-worst movie I'd ever seen after Dragonball: Evolution.

He should have known better to voice his rants. Hollywood is a very small, elite club and everyone knows everyone else. You gotta play nice if you want to stay in the club.
 
Kinda sucks tbh because Chronicle was fucking awesome.
 
I've never seen the newest of new Fantastic Fours

Can't imagine I ever would

That and amazing Spiderman 2
 
never heard of him.

RIP none the less
 
Yeah, Who the fuck is this guy?
 
never heard of him.

RIP none the less
Yeah, Who the fuck is this guy?
Josh Trank is the director of Chronicle (2012) and Fantastic Four (2015).

Below is a summary of the problems Trank had with the FF project:

Update: May 1, 2015

FANTASTIC FOUR Troubles Led to Josh Trank's STAR WARS Firing


Josh-Trank-Fantastic-Four-050115-Dragonlord.jpg


According to The Hollywood Reporter's sources, reports of the director Josh Trank's unusual conduct during the making of Fox's upcoming Fantastic Four movie had raised alarm among Lucasfilm executives that were entrusting him with the second Star Wars standalone film.

Trank, 30, had raised eyebrows in April when he didn't appear as scheduled at a Star Wars celebration in Anaheim. At the time, both Disney and the director cited illness as the cause but multiple knowledgeable sources say the studio had asked the filmmaker not to attend while considering whether to proceed with him on the second spinoff in a planned series of films.

Indeed, producers on Fantastic Four, set for release July 30, are said to have faced great challenges pulling the film together given behavior described by one insider as "erratic" and at times "very isolated." Trank did not offer clear direction, this person adds, saying, "If you've got someone who can't answer questions or who isn't sure or is in hiding, that's not good."

Among those bumps in making the Fantastic Four movie: Trank has several small dogs who were left in a rented house in New Orleans while the film was shooting there. According to sources, as much as $100,000 worth of damage was done to the property. Production considers any destruction of the property to be Trank's responsibility. Trank was sometimes indecisive and uncommunicative. Producers Simon Kinberg and Hutch Parker had to step in to help pull the film together, though sources stress that Trank was still on set and directing the film.

Kinberg, who is producing the second Star Wars standalone project (the first, Rogue One, is being directed by Gareth Edwards for a December 2016 release), is said to have communicated his displeasure with Trank to Kathleen Kennedy and the team at Lucasfilm. As the Star Wars brain trust heard more about Trank's behavior and working style, they became less confident in handing over the film to him.

Inside a 'Star Wars' Firing: 'Fantastic Four' Problems Led to Josh Trank's Ouster


Update: August 6, 2015

Josh Trank Hints Fox Responsible for FANTASTIC FOUR Bomb


Josh-Trank-Fantastic-Four-080615-Dragonlord.jpg


With the new Fantastic Four reboot getting some of the worst reviews of any comic book movie in recent history - currently 9% on Rotten Tomatoes - director Josh Trank (Chronicle) took to Twitter to address the negative reviews.

Trank tweeted, "A year ago I had a fantastic version of this. And it would've received great reviews. You'll probably never see it. That's reality though." Of course, the tweet certainly seems to suggest that the director might have been dissatisfied with changes that were made to his film, presumably at the direction of 20th Century Fox.

That's a pretty damning tweet, and it re-raises the question about whether or not the film was taken away from him for re-shoots. And if he was in charge of re-shoots, then it definitely sounds like he wasn't happy with what had to be recut. A couple minutes after Trank made the tweet, he deleted it. However, as is often the case with Twitter, the tweet was screencaptured and is being retweeted.

It's rare for directors to cite an earlier cut when their movies get panned, but Trank's name has already been dragged through the mud. The rumors said that Trank was erratic and indecisive on set and that there were costly rental property damages from his dogs.

Josh Trank Claims His Fantastic Four Version Would've Received Great Reviews


Update: August 7, 2015

New Details on Josh Trank's Bizarre Behavior on the FANTASTIC FOUR Set


Josh-Trank-Fantastic-Four-080715-Dragonlord.jpg


EW's sources close to those films say, without question, director Josh Trank was fired from the movie after Lucasfilm executives investigated rumors of his behavior on the Fantastic Four set and feared he would be too chaotic to trust with one of the stand-alone movies.

Trank's tweet as Fantastic Four hits theaters unraveled the entire facade. Based on his own words, we now know that Trank had been removed from the film, was not happy with the final cut, and he wanted the world to understand that the movie being demolished by critics was not the one he wanted to make. That reshot climax, by the way, is the main thing singled out in many reviews for being out of sync with the rest of the film and the character development that came before.

Several high level sources close to Fantastic Four - spoken to independently of each other - have told EW the rift on set was not about creative differences but rather destructive and combative behavior Trank demonstrated toward the crew, producers, studio and even the stars. When he was wooed by Fox for Fantastic Four, the movie had no set limits. But as the green-light loomed, Trank was indecisive and repeatedly requested sweeping changes that caused studio confidence to plummet. During photography, Trank's personal disputes - involving accusations of deliberate damage done to the house he was renting, as revenge over a dispite with the landlord - which sources say eventually manifested on set as hostility and frustration toward the cast and crew.

Not all these new sources agree, however. Some who worked on the film say Trank broke, for sure, but was driven to the breaking point by the studio, and that his clash was not with Kinberg but Fox production president Emma Watts. According to several individuals who worked on the movie, the studio delayed casting and script approvals, slashed the budget by tens of millions from what was originally promised during the development phase, and tried to force last-minute script changes to the film just as principal photography was beginning.

There was uncertainty about who should star. Michael B. Jordan as Johnny Storm was set from the start, but the studio wanted a different actor than Miles Teller for Reed Richards. Trank won that battle, even though he later developed a mutually disdainful relationship with the actor but Fox insisted that Kate Mara be given the role of Sue Storm, and Trank treated her badly as a result. Some say he was cruel, others say merely cold. No one says they got along.

Different sources say Trank was indecisive, others say the studio was hemming and hawing on his choices. Either way, the script was not finalized until late in preproduction, and continued to change right through reshoots, which stalled crew workers who were trying to build sets, make costumes, props, and prep the movie. This created confusion and stress from the get-go that often boiled over among department heads trying to put together pieces of a movie that was still in flux. That’s not in doubt, but the question is: who was at fault?

Sources tell EW that, yes, the studio was desperate to protect the movie and didn't want the story to focus on how the studio and producers were rehabilitating a troubled project, but they and Trank's representatives were also trying to protect the filmmaker from public embarrassment. With his angry tweet, many outsiders interpreted it as Trank biting the hand that fed him, but several individuals who worked on the movie now say he was actually biting the hand that shielded the public from his meltdown and vindictive behavior.

Details on Josh Trank's Destructive and Combative Behavior on Fantastic Four Set


Update: October 9, 2015

FANTASTIC FOUR Ends U.S. Theatrical Run with $56 Million!


After a nine week run, Fox and Josh Trank's Fantastic Four made a paltry $56,051,712. That's $10,000 less than what the first Fantastic Four movie made during its opening weekend in 2005.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=125781
 
And tbh the new Fantastic 4 wasn't that bad, It was no worse than any of Singers X-Men films.
 
OK but to be clear he didn't actually dieded, just his career did, right?
 
The movie is less than a year old. I wouldn't give the last rights on his career just yet.

He does have a Troy Duffy vibe about him though.
 
If they can give m night gsazhjkjfd another chance after his god awful avatar. I'm sure trank will be back


M night shulomacher killed a whole franchise
 
Based on his horrible movies and inexcusable unprofessionalism...

...good riddance.
 
Just a year and half ago he was in production of a high profile comic book movie with a Star Wars movie lined up afterwards and now he's can't buy his way onto a set.
 
I didn't think F4 was that bad too, that being said, independent films buddy
 
Just like Professional Sports Athletes, you can be a douchey clown with shitty behavior as long as you can deliver when it counts. Some stars are eccentric as hell and are practically unbearable to work with.... But

As soon as the performance slips, you get dropped like a bad habit because people ain't got no time to deal with your shit.
 
Back
Top