- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 96
And Rakic outpointed VolkanIt wasn't close. Oezdemir won the fight. 29-28.
Oezdemir > Reyes > Jones
.....so what?
In this divison you need to kill for secure a win
And Rakic outpointed VolkanIt wasn't close. Oezdemir won the fight. 29-28.
Oezdemir > Reyes > Jones
The stats would disagree with that and Jones had 0 grappling until the last 2 rounds which we already established that he won.Reyes was punching the air. And Jones dominated in the grappling department.
Aggression/ octagon control are irrelevant via the judging criteria until effective striking and grappling are equal, which they factually werent.Trolling is what its called when people who know better act like Aggression/ Octagon control isn't a thing anyomre, just because they hate a specific fighter and are crying because that fighter didnt lose.
I mean, I never said the fight wasn't competitive, just that the Oezdemir fight was more competitive. There is still a place and use for stats. They aren't the end all be all, but they do tell part of the story.judging fights will always be subjective, thats exactly why the 'hard' stats (which are actually subjective estimates, too) mean absolutely nothing.
more people scored the fight for oezdemir, but you're right, you can see it either way. that means we have to respect the jones decision as well. if reyes was better prepared he could've removed all doubt. again, i think he did enough to win 3 rounds, but it wasnt clear enough, was it?
So you're saying that the judges get it right every single time then, regardless of stats?You gotta love how the people who are not good at understanding or assessing the objective criteria are the ones who bombard the place with the "proof" of robberies.
If their stats meant anything we would never have controversy. It's a fun little routine we do every fuckin time in this place.
You are not taking into consideration octagon control and the takedown points, which count accross rounds. Dominick was scared and tired the whole fight. He didn't want to fight.
Reyes was punching the air. And Jones dominated in the grappling department.
Is he really underrated? I don't see people saying he sucks, nor that he is an uncrowned champ specially after getting handled by DC and Smith, I think he is rightfully ratedWhile Oezdemir is massively underrated here.
Styles make fights you really think Oezdemir can stuffs jon's takedowns like Reyes, or has cardio for 5 rounds.
Exactly, and like I said in my previous comment; God forbid anyone make a claim and then present their evidence for that claim. Fuck me right?This is worst strawman I've ever read. It doesn't matter how clear a robbery is there will always be a percentage of people who side with judges call. Typically the winner's fans or gamblers who cash, and the bigger the fanbase the higher the 'not a robbery' voice will be.
Fact you can't name one robbery that is clear to everyone.
Octagon control does not come into consideration until striking and grappling are equal, which they factually were not.
There was definitely a strong voice on here saying he wasn't elite pre Saturday. And because of Reyes vs Oezdemir was close, Reyes was a lucky can who couldn't hang with jones.Is he really underrated? I don't see people saying he sucks, nor that he is an uncrowned champ specially after getting handled by DC and Smith, I think he is rightfully rated
True, the same was said about Chris and Cody, I knew he was good but he was better than I expectedThere was definitely a strong voice on here saying he wasn't elite pre Saturday. And because of Reyes vs Oezdemir was close, Reyes was a lucky can who couldn't hang with jones.
There was no robbery. A robbery is extremely rare and it’ll still be at least slightly subjective, you’re right. It was a close fight. It’s not a straw man, these are the facts.This is worst strawman I've ever read. It doesn't matter how clear a robbery is there will always be a percentage of people who side with judges call. Typically the winner's fans or gamblers who cash, and the bigger the fanbase the higher the 'not a robbery' voice will be.
Fact you can't name one robbery that is clear to everyone.
I think the oezdemir fight was less competitive and I thought Reyes lost when I watched. Actually won money on Reyes in that fight and still thought he lost pretty clearly.I mean, I never said the fight wasn't competitive, just that the Oezdemir fight was more competitive. There is still a place and use for stats. They aren't the end all be all, but they do tell part of the story.
Diego Sanchez vs Ross PearsonThis is worst strawman I've ever read. It doesn't matter how clear a robbery is there will always be a percentage of people who side with judges call. Typically the winner's fans or gamblers who cash, and the bigger the fanbase the higher the 'not a robbery' voice will be.
Fact you can't name one robbery that is clear to everyone.
Volkan would go all out swinging in the first round. He’s got no time for point fighting. Unless Jones is able to wrestle him like DC did, it is very possible for Volkan to winIt wasn't close. Oezdemir won the fight. 29-28.
Oezdemir > Reyes > Jones
You're retarded. That % strikes for Jones is inflated from leg kicks. Those are easy to land and they pump up your striking numbers.You can't convince people that think outlanding isn't the most important thing, and walking forward and % of strikes landed should be placed above
So you're saying that the judges get it right every single time then, regardless of stats?
God forbid anyone make a claim and provide their evidence on here.
Diego Sanchez vs Ross Pearson
Raging Al vs Mas
Haven't seen a single argument for the winner anywhere