D
Deleted member 359865
Guest
After re watching the fight for the 5th time (because it never gets old watching your favorite fighter defeat an overwhelming favorite) I now see how big of a factor Conor McGregor's fatigue came into play when defending the submissions. I want to note that I did indeed call his ground game "non-existent" earlier today because I for one expected him to lose via submission, and the first time watching it honestly look liked he kinda gave up. But around the 5th time void of favoritism, I can see how hard he was breathing and how much energy he exhausted trying to avoid that guillotine especially after taking some tough shots to the face and a hard knee to the stomach.
So to those whom I argued with earlier today about the matter, I can now say that I see where you all were coming from. BUT, I do maintain that his ground game probably isnt where it should be to compete at the top level outside of the FW division, AND considering the obscene amount of shit talking he did leading up to this fight you cannot really blame anyone for exaggerating his weaknesses when he pretty much sold himself as being invincible and unbeatable. So there you have it, I am a rational human being who is willing to consider other points of view, and can come to terms with being wrong.
EDIT: Split this ONE paragraph into two because lots of you have clearly never written anything scholarly in your life and do not actually know what a full detailed paragraph looks likes or consists of. So here you go, two blocks for the benefit of those who are uneducated.
So to those whom I argued with earlier today about the matter, I can now say that I see where you all were coming from. BUT, I do maintain that his ground game probably isnt where it should be to compete at the top level outside of the FW division, AND considering the obscene amount of shit talking he did leading up to this fight you cannot really blame anyone for exaggerating his weaknesses when he pretty much sold himself as being invincible and unbeatable. So there you have it, I am a rational human being who is willing to consider other points of view, and can come to terms with being wrong.
EDIT: Split this ONE paragraph into two because lots of you have clearly never written anything scholarly in your life and do not actually know what a full detailed paragraph looks likes or consists of. So here you go, two blocks for the benefit of those who are uneducated.
Last edited by a moderator: