- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 42,374
- Reaction score
- 5
Well this explains Graham flipping on the issue.
They should, he’s terrible.
If he is so terrible then why was he put in his current position?They should, he’s terrible.
None. Those are the reasons.Outside of the Russian thing and him not wanting to prosecute Trump's political enemies.
What would be the reason to fire him? I hate the little weasel. But if I were a republican I don't see a reason to fire him.
He crossed tRUmp. He has defied tRUmp. That is the GOP standard now. You defy tRUmp you're defying party and need to be dealt with accordingly. Supporters eat it up tooOutside of the Russian thing and him not wanting to prosecute Trump's political enemies.
What would be the reason to fire him? I hate the little weasel. But if I were a republican I don't see a reason to fire him.
That's the thing. It's mostly the same Republicans as it's always been. They just needed luminary of shit to show them how low they could go without the public voting them out of office and the law sending them to prison.For those who doubted that the takeover of the Republican Party by these fucking savages was a real thing...
It is! Has he even had to make one move? Fire one staff member?But I thought Trump's ability to assess people and put together the best cabinet that the nation has ever seen was his chief strength. You know, how he said he might not know what he is doing, but he'll hire the best people, the best people, believe me...
Well he also didn't interfere to stop/delay the charging of those two republican Reps that were Trump supporters!None. Those are the reasons.
But while Graham said Tuesday that Sessions could be replaced, he said any new attorney general would have to pledge to allow Mueller's probe to continue without interference. “Nobody is going to take Jeff’s place that doesn’t commit to the Senate, and the country as a whole, that Mueller will be allowed to finish his job without political interference,” Graham said.