Republican voters now favor single payer health care

May I ask what gave you the impression that the Republican Party was headed in that direction?
Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, even Rand Paul to some extent. 2012 Republican debates, you had Ron Paul and Johnson laying out libertarian ideas and being widely applauded. I was hoping we would get libertarianism to take over like nationalist-populism, but it just didn't happen. It'd be nice if both sides were more libertarian and less authoritarian.
 
Trump won because white people are still the voting majority in this country and a measurable group of them can be riled up over imaginary racial/gender grievances to swing close elections. I might seem cynical on this point but everything else is just the window dressing that subset of the population told themselves to justify that other element. The post-election hypocrisy that they demonstrate is proof enough. The only issues, ethical or political, on which they have not flip flopped is the immigration conversation. Corruption, government intervention in the markets picking winners and losers, crime, building the economy, etc. Flip flopped on every single one of them...except immigration and tax cuts for the wealthy.

But to get back on track. I'm grad the general GOP voter is starting to think seriously about single payer. The ACA demonstrated for a lot of people that government intervention in the coverage aspect of the healthcare industry yielded real benefits for a lot of otherwise marginalized people.

We saw this during the election cycle when those random conversations were being shared about people wanting the government to repeal Obamacare but protect their ACA coverage. Obamacare does what it set out to do. And people know that it could be better but they have very little interest in going back to the pre-ACA model. So that only leaves one direction --> single payer.
The thing is, it's becoming more of a zero sum game. If everyone is playing identity politics, then white identity politics wins as long as they are a voting majority. They could very well be a voting majority for another 40-50 years. Demographic majority for another 25-30 years, but likely to be a voting majority for even longer. And even afterward, they'll be a plurality. If you splinter the minority vote enough especially. It's just a losing game for Democrats.
 
" What people don't like is modern identity politics where it's all judgemental and all about calling people out for the tiniest of infractions. Yeah, the average person doesn't like being constantly told how racist and sexist and homophobic they are and how they need to check their privilege. Keep playing these games, Jack, and keep losing."

So, basically, if you're right, something like this had to happen:

Political hopeful: How do I get support for my popular policy agenda?
Political consultant: You just gotta convince the vast majority of voters that you hate them.
PH: Awesome! You're hired.

I see this scenario as more likely:

PH: How do I get support for my unpopular policy agenda?
PC: You just gotta convince enough people that the other guys hate the vast majority of voters.
PH: Cool.
Yeah, that's a stretch...

You did get a sensible chuckle out of me, though. :)
 
Fair enough.
My point is, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Its meh to me.
When you include the margin of error on the bottom, it's not even a majority of Republicans.
I think it's a really big deal because recent pieces like this: Medicare For All is a Socialist Dream and an American Nightmare are no longer persuasive to Republicans, and this also suggests a major shift in the bottom line of conservative opinion from just a year ago, according to Pew, who found that 60% of Republicans didn't want the government responsible for healthcare (roughly). While the questions asked were different, we can see that attitudes are changing.
 
This reflects a rather serious misunderstanding of what identity politics is. The basic story is that the majority of the public is left on policy and right on identity issues so the left-leaning party tries to make elections about policy and the right-wing party tries to make elections about identity. It's amazing that some people have so much trouble grasping such a simple dynamic.
I remember an episode of 30 Rock (pre Trump, obviously) when Tina Fey’s scumbag loser boyfriend was asked about his political views and said, “I’m socially conservative and fiscally liberal”... and that was like a punchline because obviously the “smart” or “cultured” thing was to be the opposite “socially liberal, fiscally conservative.”

I remember that line because it landed hard. I was line, man, I think I’m the scum bag boyfriend (before deplorable was a thing, you know).
 
Trump won because white people are still the voting majority in this country and a measurable group of them can be riled up over imaginary racial/gender grievances to swing close elections. I might seem cynical on this point but everything else is just the window dressing that subset of the population told themselves to justify that other element. The post-election hypocrisy that they demonstrate is proof enough. The only issues, ethical or political, on which they have not flip flopped is the immigration conversation. Corruption, government intervention in the markets picking winners and losers, crime, building the economy, etc. Flip flopped on every single one of them...except immigration and tax cuts for the wealthy.

But to get back on track. I'm grad the general GOP voter is starting to think seriously about single payer. The ACA demonstrated for a lot of people that government intervention in the coverage aspect of the healthcare industry yielded real benefits for a lot of otherwise marginalized people.

We saw this during the election cycle when those random conversations were being shared about people wanting the government to repeal Obamacare but protect their ACA coverage. Obamacare does what it set out to do. And people know that it could be better but they have very little interest in going back to the pre-ACA model. So that only leaves one direction --> single payer.

You are right, white people only vote based on race. Its unbelievable the ignorance and self righteous attitude you and your ilk possess. Its comical to me that you are responsible for moderating others opinions when you have such laughable opinions yourself. Keep living in an echo chamber of idiocy.
 
what do they think of trumps empty promises about replacing it with something better? do they blame the GOP for not doing it?
Oddly enough, more Republican voters support Medicare for all than Democratic senators.

 
From a new Reuters poll:
2G53LVf.png

By the slimmest of margins, but nonetheless a huge step forward as conservative voters are realizing how ridiculous it was to vote against their interests on such a fundamentally important issue.

It's a horrible fucking idea. If this poll is true, these people do not know what they are asking for. American consumers will not like socialized medicine. It's a money pit that will result in rationed care/long wait periods and a big decline in quality of care.
 
Oddly enough, more Republican voters support Medicare for all than Democratic senators.


centrist dems have long suppressed UHC,mainly cos of all the cash funnelled to them by the healthcare industry, same as the republicans,left wing push and the perception that obamacare was watered down and obstructed and is now being dismantled is whats driving this. they will change their tune when its politically expedient to do so, republicans will hang on to the bitter end
 
It's a horrible fucking idea. If this poll is true, these people do not know what they are asking for. American consumers will not like socialized medicine. It's a money pit that will result in rationed care/long wait periods and a big decline in quality of care.
Like
 
centrist dems have long suppressed UHC,mainly cos of all the cash funnelled to them by the healthcare industry, same as the republicans,left wing push and the perception that obamacare was watered down and obstructed and is now being dismantled is whats driving this. they will change their tune when its politically expedient to do so, republicans will hang on to the bitter end
Yeah, it shows the disconnect between the people and corporations. Eventually, the Democrats will have to face the political reality. Agreed that Republicans will hold out longer. But eventually the Overton window will shift across the board. In the rest of the Western world, universal healthcare is just a given on both sides.
 
Yeah, it shows the disconnect between the people and corporations. Eventually, the Democrats will have to face the political reality. Agreed that Republicans will hold out longer. But eventually the Overton window will shift across the board. In the rest of the Western world, universal healthcare is just a given on both sides.
the disconnect between dems and the voters is becoming more apparent, more progressive candidates winning without party support, and ignored by the media, its going to be an interesting next few years, maybe regular republicans will wake up and do the same, but i doubt it. i can see a split happeninmg in right wing parties somewhere down the line , and like the UK the mad as bats section will split away to form the "freedom" or "patriot" party.
 
Assuming enough politicians support UHC to make it law, there's the question of how much should it cover. Should it leave people with thousands of dollars of out of pocket expenses? Or should it be Sanders' plan which leaves no OOP expenses? If the former, private insurance companies will stick around.
 
the disconnect between dems and the voters is becoming more apparent, more progressive candidates winning without party support, and ignored by the media, its going to be an interesting next few years, maybe regular republicans will wake up and do the same, but i doubt it. i can see a split happeninmg in right wing parties somewhere down the line , and like the UK the mad as bats section will split away to form the "freedom" or "patriot" party.
Yeah, I recognize this trend happening. I'm not entirely excited, though. The idea of someone like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is exciting. However, I wish she was more informed and didn't do identity politics bullshit like comparing Ben Shapiro challenging her to a debate to catcalling. I don't know a great deal about all of the candidates, but I can't say I've found one who really excites me yet...
 
Yeah, I recognize this trend happening. I'm not entirely excited, though. The idea of someone like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is exciting. However, I wish she was more informed and didn't do identity politics bullshit like comparing Ben Shapiro challenging her to a debate to catcalling. I don't know a great deal about all of the candidates, but I can't say I've found one who really excites me yet...
cortez is politically naive, but if someone with more nous comes forward, and gets solid advice from the likes of bernie and warren, establishment dems could lose control completely, wont happen for a few years yet though.
this is probably off topic for this thread, but UHC is a no brainer in the future.
 
Last edited:
Assuming enough politicians support UHC to make it law, there's the question of how much should it cover. Should it leave people with thousands of dollars of out of pocket expenses? Or should it be Sanders' plan which leaves no OOP expenses? If the former, private insurance companies will stick around.
plenty of countries operate a two tier system, private healthcare aint going away in the US, but their market share should be severly scaled back.
 
Someone needs to check that methodology. Even using the most favorable terminology, that's surprising.

This is one reason why the Democrats need to run on healthcare, healthcare, healthcare.

Healthcare.

Healthcare, corruption, and combating the "we have the greatest economy ever" with the truths about (i) slowed job growth, (ii) slowed unemployment reduction [both of which, frankly, are natural but speak to the optics/logic of Trump's retarded position in the first place], (iii) falling wages
 
It's a horrible fucking idea. If this poll is true, these people do not know what they are asking for. American consumers will not like socialized medicine. It's a money pit that will result in rationed care/long wait periods and a big decline in quality of care.

We already operate the biggest money pit in Westernized healthcare both in government dollars spent and personal expenditures. Care is already rationed with large swaths of people unable to access it. And our quality of care is overall pretty shitty.

All of these things you say will happen if we change systems gave already be occuring for decades at this point.
 
The thing is, it's becoming more of a zero sum game. If everyone is playing identity politics, then white identity politics wins as long as they are a voting majority. They could very well be a voting majority for another 40-50 years. Demographic majority for another 25-30 years, but likely to be a voting majority for even longer. And even afterward, they'll be a plurality. If you splinter the minority vote enough especially. It's just a losing game for Democrats.

Yeah but college educated white (especially women) tend to vote Dem more than non college educated.

More people (especially) women are going to college.

It's not just race when it comes to demographics.

The GOPs only hope is the Amish...

U2BZf8H.jpg
 
Back
Top