- Joined
- Nov 23, 2002
- Messages
- 2,773
- Reaction score
- 0
32-2-1 is not 32-1
32-1 with one no-contest since May 13th, 2005. That specific enough for you?
You must be a joy to live with.
32-2-1 is not 32-1
32-1 with one no-contest since May 13th, 2005. That specific enough for you?
You must be a joy to live with.
Ronda Rousey would beat TJ Dillashaw, as proved by these rankings.
A stat is not a stat unless it's true
It makes sense, the way I see p4p is accomplishment based rankings, and Barao is more accomplished.
If Nadal loses to the #100 of the world tomorrow, then the previous #100 becomes #1 or nadal becomes #101? Rankings measure your results, not just your last fight.
stupid imo.
if thats the case then silva should still be ahead of weidman because hes accomplished a lot more at 185. obviously this logic is stupid since weidman beat silva convincingly.
dillashaw showed that hes clearly the better fighter thus should be higher then barao p4p. I dont care about how well hes done in the past because right now hes not the best 135lbs fighter.
It makes sense, the way I see p4p is accomplishment based rankings, and Barao is more accomplished.