Rate UFC 200 main card with DC vs jones II

W

wellsdj1

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
7,942
Reaction score
0
I'm just putting up the main card or what I think the main card will be.

DC vs jones II main
Tate vs Nunes co main
Aldo vs Edgar II
Cain vs Browne
Gastelum vs Hendricks

I give it 9 out of 10. As a whole it's a great card, but not one fight gets me pumped up like I was for gsp vs penn II, Liddell vs silva , jones vs DC I , etc.
 
9.1235125125/10

When it was Conor / Diaz I was at like 6/10
 
I would expect more from a 200. 7/10.
 
6 out of 10.

Considering it's a land mark card, I feel there should be more..
 
For 200? 2/10 at best. For hardcore MMA fans its a great card but UFC 200 needs to be a showcase event where every bar is packed, friends all gather together and have parties to watch the fight and people who know nothing about MMA are in attendance and are excited to watch.
 
Doesn't matter what we believe about the quality of fights, without Connor, that event is not going to sell... I gave it 300k buys at best with Edgar/Aldo. Maybe 500k with JJ/DC.
 
I agree with up 9/10 and perhaps needs just one more big fight to make things more interesting and hey you know what why not make Nate vs another interesting opponent as the co-main then the card would be done and finished... trust me it would sell
 
On a side note better have a back up plan if jones or DC gets injured. I can't imangine UFC 200 headlined by Tate vs Nunes
 
Cain vs Browne and Hendricks vs Gastelum are good fights, but don't 'move the needle' as someone like Dana would say. If Condit vs someone and maybe Romero/Khabib/Dillashaw vs someone, was on it, it would look much better.
 
my interest is about maybe a 3 now

jones looked terrible tonight, but the first jones/dc fight was also boring
i can't watch a tate fight seriously
145 fight
cain and browne are the heavyweights that i can't stand the most
hendricks' time has passed, boring wrestling decision
 
ArtemV said:
Cain vs Browne and Hendricks vs Gastelum are good fights, but don't 'move the needle' as someone like Dana would say. If Condit vs someone and maybe Romero/Khabib/Dillashaw vs someone, was on it, it would look much better.
Click to expand...

Khabib would have been super awesome but there is ramadan
 
LSU said:
For 200? 2/10 at best. For hardcore MMA fans its a great card but UFC 200 needs to be a showcase event where every bar is packed, friends all gather together and have parties to watch the fight and people who know nothing about MMA are in attendance and are excited to watch.
Click to expand...
Exactly. People keep grilling me for grilling this card.

Its a really solid card--- for any other card--- 200 has been getting hyped as the biggest card ever for a looooong time. And this shit... especially without Conor.. will be lucky for 400k buys. Jones/DC can maybe push that to closer to 700k, but I don't think the rematch has the intrigue of the first fight.
 
7/10 . could be a lot better for a special event like 200. but its sure as hell much better now without that pointless freakshow rematch with Conor, it was 3/10 before. with Jones its up to 7/10 in my mind
 
The UFC should have dropped the number ppvs after UFC 100. Should just call it DC vs jones II
 
Honestly Tate vs Nunes shouldn't co-main.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,490
Messages
56,650,135
Members
175,334
Latest member
dubhlinn

Share this page

Back
Top