Rampage/Brooks were the better fighters,Chandler/Mo were slightly better wrestlers...

TheApotheosis**

White Belt
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Thats the bottom line.


Brooks and Rampage are clearly the better fighters, you saw it tonight with the damage and significant strikes they put...Specially brooks, he was way closer to finishing chandler...He destroyed him when they actually fought.


All Chandler did was control brooks with wrestling but even brooks controlled him as well.


Same thing with MO/Rampage...King Mo was just a more persistent wrestler but he was clearly getting stuffed and couldn't do anything.


Finally we have competent judges who judge the Fight, not the wrestling match.


Sorry but the Right decisions happened tonight...the better fighters won.

The Slightly better wrestlers clearly weren't the better fighters thus they don't deserve to win.
 
Mo likely deserved the win in a shit fight. We can call Rampage the better fighter, but neither of them did much, especially round by round. Shit decision, I think.

I missed Chandler/Brooks for boxing.
 
In current MMA judging, looking across all fights for reference, King Mo won.
 
Back
Top