Racism and Faithism are interlinked.

[seiger]

Hating a people based on an antiquated and biologically artificial crassly reductive grouping of skin colour,

and

Hating people based on a crassly reductive population grouping of faith group

are both bigoted and ignorant cultural conceits

that often betray an ignorant prejudicial mindset

and

an immature and limited ability to distinguish people

and

a tendency to otherise strangers and presume cultural supremacy over them.

In short, racism and faithism are linked very closely, follow a lot of the same traits and number a lot of the same bigots in their numbers.

Some of the biggest cheerleaders in these schizophrenically delusional perceived holy wars are the same people who hate random strangers based on their flat earther theories on race, and when you hear people decried as mussie lovers for not hating a quarter of the planet, its likely the off spring of those who called people n____ lovers in the last generation.

Now, let it be clear, not all racists are faithists, although I've yet to meet one who isn't. And it may be argued that not all people with concerns about different faiths are racist, but like the Olympic rings, that shit is interlinked.

People talk about race cards, but faithism is racism with a hall pass.

Come at me bigots.

 

[WTF2008]

Hating a people based on an antiquated and biologically artificial crassly reductive grouping of skin colour,

and

Hating people based on a crassly reductive population grouping of faith group

are both bigoted and ignorant cultural conceits

that often betray an ignorant prejudicial mindset

and

an immature and limited ability to distinguish people

and

a tendency to otherise strangers and presume cultural supremacy over them.

In short, racism and faithism are linked very closely, follow a lot of the same traits and number a lot of the same bigots in their numbers.

Some of the biggest cheerleaders in these schizophrenically delusional perceived holy wars are the same people who hate random strangers based on their flat earther theories on race, and when you hear people decried as mussie lovers for not hating a quarter of the planet, its likely the off spring of those who called people n____ lovers in the last generation.

Now, let it be clear, not all racists are faithists, although I've yet to meet one who isn't. And it may be argued that not all people with concerns about different faiths are racist, but like the Olympic rings, that shit is interlinked.

People talk about race cards, but faithism is racism with a hall pass.

Come at me bigots.

It's just so easy to link (like the olympic rings) the sexual assaults and rapes to the new people in town. Are they faithists in the way you want to spin it?

Racism/faithism is the tenet of islam. If you are not a muslim, you should die. This is an actual enforced part of the Quran.

This isn't antiquated, it's happening daily.

 

[SpawnOfNyarlathotep]

Fuck you Seiger. It's not because of your skin color (which I don't even know) that I hate you, it's because of your retarded opinions and constant lying.

 

[seiger]

It's just so easy to link (like the olympic rings) the sexual assaults and rapes to the new people in town. Are they faithists in the way you want to spin it?

Racism/faithism is the tenet of islam. If you are not a muslim, you should die. This is an actual enforced part of the Quran.

This isn't antiquated, it's happening daily.

faith groups are held to different standards in a secular society. this is true for all of them. society doesnt own the ideas in mens heads, or womens for that matter. we live in a secular society based on negative freedom that specifically prohibits certain actions, and applies that to everyone.

some behaviours are prohibited. not ideas. even political parties are allowed to exist that prescribe hatred. faith groups are ALL subject to the wrathful ire of a secular humanist viewpoint. they exist because society hasnt banned god, however anachronistic and antiquated his or her lore is when held up against negative freedom, secularism and diversity.

lastly, you are attacking freedom, not defending it, so stop pretending to be for secularity and diversity and freedom when you are inherently and explicitly against it.

 

[WTF2008]

faith groups are held to different standards in a secular society. this is true for all of them. society doesnt own the ideas in mens heads, or womens for that matter. we live in a secular society based on negative freedom that specifically prohibits certain actions, and applies that to everyone.

some behaviours are prohibited. not ideas. even political parties are allowed to exist that prescribe hatred. faith groups are ALL subject to the wrathful ire of a secular humanist viewpoint. they exist because society hasnt banned god, however anachronistic and antiquated his or her lore is when held up against negative freedom, secularism and diversity.

lastly, you are attacking freedom, not defending it, so stop pretending to be for secularity and diversity and freedom when you are inherently and explicitly against it.

Blabbedy blah blah. Hippety hooplah.

You always assume someone is attacking you.

All that gibberish said literally nothing.

I don't even think you know what secularity is. So now you're suddenly an atheist?

 

[Bald1]

Criticism of an ideology isn't any kind of a phobia or "ism", no matter how much you stomp your feet, slam your eyes shut, and try to wish it so. Criticising peoples ideas and choices is the most valid form criticism there is. And that's what religion is - a chosen ideology that helps people make choices based on the ideas and tenets of their chosen faith. Yup, it's a choice. It's not something biological, and it's not something that can't be changed. Why shouldn't it be open to mockery, criticism, or questioning?

 

[seiger]

Blabbedy blah blah. Hippety hooplah.

You always assume someone is attacking you.

All that gibberish said literally nothing.

I don't even think you know what secularity is. So now you're suddenly an atheist?

i never claimed to be anything, and you have no coherent arguments so you are waffling. you simply arent intelligent enough to process what i said, never mind refute it.

 

[seiger]

Criticism of an ideology isn't any kind of a phobia or "ism", no matter how much you stomp your feet, slam your eyes shut, and try to wish it so. Criticising peoples ideas and choices is the most valid form criticism there is. And that's what religion is - a chosen ideology that helps people make choices based on the ideas and tenets of their chosen faith. Yup, it's a choice. It's not something biological, and it's not something that can't be changed. Why shouldn't it be open to mockery, criticism, or questioning?

attacking a population en masse for their cultural affiliation to a faith group is akin to covert racism in a lot of ways. not everyone is attacking the people of the religion, but a lot are. besides racism is just a cultural conceit with no basis in reality or biology, so i dont really see much difference between that and personalising it to othering aspects of the culture itself.

this practice of turning those who are not members of us, in the minds of the bigot, into binaries is quite pronounced and its very easy to see how they are two sides of the same coin.

 

[Bald1]

Some people who are "not members of us" are such for good reasons. Your irrational need to be a contrarian has got your logic in a rear naked choke.

 

[Mr Holmes]

Not to be outdone by @Leroy Jenkins, @seiger pukes up his own full retard thread.

 

[Renard]

If it's impossible for a culture to be inferior or superior to another, why don't you go live in a shack in Africa, never to be heard from again. I give it 30 mins before the local population mugs you.

 

[glennrod]

attacking a population en masse for their cultural affiliation to a faith group is akin to covert racism in a lot of ways. not everyone is attacking the people of the religion, but a lot are. besides racism is just a cultural conceit with no basis in reality or biology, so i dont really see much difference between that and personalising it to othering aspects of the culture itself.

this practice of turning those who are not members of us, in the minds of the bigot, into binaries is quite pronounced and its very easy to see how they are two sides of the same coin.

Why do you keep throwing the word "bigot" around, at the same time as defending an incredibly oppressive, violent and bigoted religion?..this is like listening to a serial rapists views on romance..

 

[Kframe]

Hating a people based on an antiquated and biologically artificial crassly reductive grouping of skin colour,

and

Hating people based on a crassly reductive population grouping of faith group

are both bigoted and ignorant cultural conceits

that often betray an ignorant prejudicial mindset

and

an immature and limited ability to distinguish people

and

a tendency to otherise strangers and presume cultural supremacy over them.

In short, racism and faithism are linked very closely, follow a lot of the same traits and number a lot of the same bigots in their numbers.

Some of the biggest cheerleaders in these schizophrenically delusional perceived holy wars are the same people who hate random strangers based on their flat earther theories on race, and when you hear people decried as mussie lovers for not hating a quarter of the planet, its likely the off spring of those who called people n____ lovers in the last generation.

Now, let it be clear, not all racists are faithists, although I've yet to meet one who isn't. And it may be argued that not all people with concerns about different faiths are racist, but like the Olympic rings, that shit is interlinked.

People talk about race cards, but faithism is racism with a hall pass.

Come at me bigots.

Now what was that supposed to do? How is this going to make me hate the Muslims less? They are barbaric.. They have shithole countries. You have no proof of convergence. All I have to do is look outside the cities and see the poverty stricken shithole the rest of the populace lives in.

You have done literally nothing with this post.

 

[Kframe]

faith groups are held to different standards in a secular society. this is true for all of them. society doesnt own the ideas in mens heads, or womens for that matter. we live in a secular society based on negative freedom that specifically prohibits certain actions, and applies that to everyone.

some behaviours are prohibited. not ideas. even political parties are allowed to exist that prescribe hatred. faith groups are ALL subject to the wrathful ire of a secular humanist viewpoint. they exist because society hasnt banned god, however anachronistic and antiquated his or her lore is when held up against negative freedom, secularism and diversity.

lastly, you are attacking freedom, not defending it, so stop pretending to be for secularity and diversity and freedom when you are inherently and explicitly against it.

You didn't address the rape problem by muslims..

 

[seiger]

Some people who are "not members of us" are such for good reasons. Your irrational need to be a contrarian has got your logic in a rear naked choke.

except muslims are members of the western world, and you are following a false definition which is an ignorant lie. your irrational need to otherise people and to pretend those who dont look like you or pray in the same language arent part of a diverse society, betrays a bigoted myopic view point that is alien to our culture.

 

[seiger]

Now what was that supposed to do? How is this going to make me hate the Muslims less? They are barbaric.. They have shithole countries. You have no proof of convergence. All I have to do is look outside the cities and see the poverty stricken shithole the rest of the populace lives in.

You have done literally nothing with this post.

you are the one who is talking in a barbaric way about strangers. i could give a shit who you hate.

you dont belong in the west.

 

[seiger]

Not to be outdone by @Leroy Jenkins, @seiger pukes up his own full retard thread.

says the empty poster with no counter argument.

click something else. you arent welcome here.

 

[seiger]

You didn't address the rape problem by muslims..

the one with no sources?

 

[MicroBrew]

It is and it isn't...
It Depends...

I will expand on the above comments later; no time right now.

So Seiger are you ready to condemn Islam then? Cause you know Islam is racist and preached hatred of other faiths.

 

[Bald1]

except muslims are members of the western world, and you are following a false definition which is an ignorant lie. your irrational need to otherise people and to pretend those who dont look like you or pray in the same language arent part of a diverse society, betrays a bigoted myopic view point that is alien to our culture.

Condems bigotry, yet defends Islam at every turn.
Talks of the western world, and Islam being part of it, ignores history.
Talks of definitions, yet admittedly doesn't know anything about Islam.
Speaks of irrationality, yet defends something he does not understand.

Cute.