- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 985
- Reaction score
- 3
Oh, so everyone hates names for moves? Half a year ago, everyone on sherdog loved them.
Listen, if you want to talk about jiu jitsu in someway without actually getting up and demonstrating the move, than things will need names for reference. Especially when a move becomes popular.
Are people here really mad that people have a name for a D'arce, and a name for an Anaconda, as opposed to just calling them both "triangle chokes with the appliers upperbody." What about Kimuras and Americanas?
Judo has names for most things, and they do just fine. Hell, wrestling has names for most of the moves they have.
Yeah, it's cool that Brazillians can be good without knowing what anything is called, but if we are going to talk about a technique or refer to one in a match, we need to call it something.
I don't know why this is an issue.
That's what I was thinking. If every variation of a choke, is just called a 'choke' how am I going to know what you are talking about, without you demonstrating it. Although to be fair there are some things that are over-named.