Hi everybody.
I`m planning to put sprints back into my routine, because i`m not pleased with my progress.
My goal is fat loss/general fitness.
So my question is:
Are longer sprints, like 200 - 400 m generally better for fat loss than short distances?
If i sprint 200m uphill, jog back and repeat until i cant do no more, lets say 5-7 times, is it more effective than sprinting 50 - 100m uphill jog back and repeat until i can do no more, like 10 - 15 times?
When comparing hiit to lsd it is often talked about the body`s "hormonal response"?
Is it the same for both ways (long sprints/short sprints) if you really go until you cant anymore or has one an advantage above the other?
Thank you!
I`m planning to put sprints back into my routine, because i`m not pleased with my progress.
My goal is fat loss/general fitness.
So my question is:
Are longer sprints, like 200 - 400 m generally better for fat loss than short distances?
If i sprint 200m uphill, jog back and repeat until i cant do no more, lets say 5-7 times, is it more effective than sprinting 50 - 100m uphill jog back and repeat until i can do no more, like 10 - 15 times?
When comparing hiit to lsd it is often talked about the body`s "hormonal response"?
Is it the same for both ways (long sprints/short sprints) if you really go until you cant anymore or has one an advantage above the other?
Thank you!