- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Messages
- 83,007
- Reaction score
- 87,738
Well if you think bigots can't have rights like freedom of speech or the right to bear arms or the right to be free from slaverly, etc. then I'd say that would be bigotry. I guess that's an extreme case though.I know this is a silly argument, but you can't be trying to say bias against bigotry is equitable to bigotry. It defeats the entire enterprise. The issue is prejudice, I'm not prejudging, I'm judging.
This is the same argument communists use to gain support their causes "We are just anti-fascists, you don't support fascism do you?" By awarding yourself the moral high ground, you can justify any actions against anyone, sort of what actual fascists did.
Bitch fuckin' kicked her hair off
I literally showed in this example that the law was de-facto made by this decision. If you had studied you'd know that the court in allowing and disallowing actions in many ways has been seen as a lawmaker even though they really shouldn't. You'd also learn that the court's power to rule the legality of laws based on the constitution was crafted in Marbury v. Madison, expanding on their power to settle disputes between states and other entities in Chisholm v. Georgia.No it doesn't. Laws weren't supposed to be created by 9 unelected suits. This is why public school is a failure.
I literally showed in this example that the law was de-facto made by this decision. If you had studied you'd know that the court in allowing and disallowing actions in many ways has been seen as a lawmaker even though they really shouldn't. You'd also learn that the court's power to rule the legality of laws based on the constitution was crafted in Marbury v. Madison, expanding on their power to settle disputes between states and other entities in Chisholm v. Georgia.
<Lmaoo>gotta do better than Sasha to disrupt the gay cake/Star Wars politics discussion. Come on Rex!!!
In Mauro Ranello voice:
"You're going to have to start referring to Asuka as 'The Operator' because she will disconnect your extension!"
Meh, I've heard guys say worse things than "chicks let me grab their pussies because I'm famous" or whatever the full quote was.“Grab her by the pussy” should have disqualified him instantly regardless of everything everybody who dug a little knew about him. The last person to ‘drain the swamp’ would be a millionaire (not actual billionaire) failed robber baron who got his money from his dad.
Oh good, more war room bullshit.
Well this is not an equitable case. I'm not saying I want their rights taken away, I'm saying they have no right to take other's rights away.Well if you think bigots can't have rights like freedom of speech or the right to bear arms or the right to be free from slaverly, etc. then I'd say that would be bigotry. I guess that's an extreme case though.
This isn't really the case, he shook things up by saying shit without the bs. He didn't go to BJU offcamera and say he supports states rights, as Dick Cheney did in 2000, he straight said Mexicans are sent (by MEXICO) to rape. He was the candidate, like in movies like Spider-man in 2002 with superhero costumes, that said he wasn't embarrassed to say whites are the best. I live in a blue state he couldn't and didn't win, and I know of two whites who had never voted in four decades prior (their eligible lifetime) who voted for Trump meaninglessly.Well that's kinda what I'm saying.
I would disagree that Trump got the nomination because of the "bigot wing". That might have been a small part of it, but a lot of the people who were Trump supporters at the time (that I spoke to at least) just wanted something different or to shake things up a little because they were tired of their voices not being heard and they thought it might have changed the face of politics for the better. I probably would have considered voting for him for that reason, and I definitely don't think I'm a bigot.