1. The official Sherdog Store is back! Check it out! » Discuss it here! »

Protest watching dumb match ups?

Discussion in 'The Lightweights' started by Young Turkey, Jan 1, 2015.

  1. Young Turkey Green Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    0
    So apparently Lawler-Hendricks 3 is going down

    I don't think I only speak for myself when I say that there's very little interest in this

    I wonder if enough people started writing about how they didn't want to see this then if the UFC would pull the fight?
     
  2. ARONAbeetFEDOR Blackest Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,022
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Adesanya O'Malley
    I highly doubt they'd pull the match, unless there was an outrageous twitter tirade. This fight is gonna send either guy to the JDS zone. They could have at least let Johny have another fight or two like Lawler did.
     
  3. The Swirl Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont like Lawler Hendricks 3 either, but its not exactly a dumb match up. Both are very equally matched, and each have one win against each other. Ill-timed, yes but not stupid.

    Silva Diaz is a stupid match. Ill be protesting it by not watching it, and absolutely nothing will change.
     
  4. ib313 Imagine a Dystopian UFC

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,491
    Likes Received:
    586
    I already have no leverage since I don't buy PPV anymore
     
  5. whimsical1 White Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't understand why Robbie and Johny can't do one fight each against another opponent and then fight each other if they both win. Robbie-Johny III just seems too stale at the moment.
     
  6. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    79,606
    Likes Received:
    8,305
    It's not the matchup involving either guy that I'd like to see, but it's still a hell of a fight. Can't miss that if you're a big fan of the sport.
     
  7. GODZILLA213 Genocide Revised

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,430
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Minnesota
    In UFC trilogy fights for the title, the fighter who won the second fight has always won the third even more convincingly.

    Anyways to damn early for me. Would rather watch them fight once more each (not each other) and see where they end up.
     
  8. Cage917r Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Niagara Falls, NY
    Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense. They fought twice for a vacant belt. Both won razor close decisions that were debatable. Once more matchup to once and for all have an undisputed champ and then allow other contenders to move forward. If you made Hendricks give Robbie a rematch in his first defense, it is only right to give him a rematch after the close loss.
     
  9. trblesome1 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,756
    Likes Received:
    5
    Lots of contenders at 170 I would like to see fight for the belt, instead we get to watch these same 2 guys fight for the belt over and over
     
  10. raaju Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    shouldn't even be on a free card. anyone willing to pay for this is a mug
     
  11. Prime Yossarian Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    0
    its the Instant rematches most people are tired of. Robbie had other fights to earn his rematch, let Hendricks do the same.
     
  12. raaju Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    the fugg r u talkin bout?

    after Johny takes out 2 dudes or no?
     
  13. cOugAr_LIbRe_85 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4,115
    Likes Received:
    0
    The thing is it's not like I don't want to see a third fight. Just not yet!

    Leave it a while. Do Rory or Lombard v Lawler first
     
  14. Koro_11 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    14,989
    Likes Received:
    4,458
    Absolutely stupid matchmaking by UFC.

    So the logic is every time there's a close title fight they gotta keep rematching, while number one contenders like Rory and Hector fight guys like Saffediene and Burkman.

    To be perfectly honest Hendricks doesn't excite me all that much. His last 3 fights he's been trying to win rounds, and failed 2 out of 3 times. Let's see some fresh matchups... it's always Edgar vs Penn/Maynard/Bendo... Cain vs JDS/Big Foot... Lawler vs Hendricks...
     
  15. VulcanNervPinch Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,995
    Likes Received:
    712
    You've got to be shitting me.


    I'd suggest the matchmakers blow their brains out, but there's obviously nothing to hit.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.