Presidential candidate implicated in criminal activity in secret papers. Will they be released?

JosephDredd

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
21,005
Reaction score
5
Not the Panama Papers... the sealed investigation of the DC Madam and her high-powered prostitute ring.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/years-later-the-dc-madam-scandal-relevant-once-more

Deborah Jeane Palfrey ran a DC-area escort service for several years, before getting caught by the police. As part of her legal defense, Palfrey’s lawyers said they would expose the service’s client list – not by releasing a list of names, but by releasing phone records.

One of those numbers, we now know, was traced back to Louisiana’s right-wing Republican senator, David Vitter, who ran on a “family values” platform.

But what’s easy to forget nearly a decade later is that the matter wasn’t fully resolved: the full phone records were never released.

...

Sibley, however, now wants to release the documents, and in fact, believes it’s in the public’s interest for him to do so. As Rachel explained last night, Sibley argued in his court filings that the materials from the D.C. Madam case “contain information relevant to the upcoming presidential election.”

In his latest filing with the Supreme Court, the lawyer added, “Time is of the essence. Given the significance of the upcoming political primaries and caucuses, in the looming Republican and Democratic conventions on July 18th and July 25th respectively, and given the impact of the presently sealed from the public record that this attorney seeks to release, upon those electoral deliberations, expedited resolution to this application is incumbent upon this court.”

Sibley went on to argue, “The delay by this court and resolution of this application in hindsight will intentionally favor one presidential candidate over others by protecting that candidate from the release of the D.C. madam phone records, which the attorney maintains are relevant to this election cycle.”

I could see any of the candidates being on this list. Even Bernie. Maybe not Hillary.
 
I read this story a few days back and I don't see how the election justifies releasing the records. It doesn't matter that it would be damaging to one of the candidates. If this was really about the election, he could just leak the specific candidate's information to a reporter and tell them go dig for corroboration.

The cynic in me thinks this is really about making some cash. There are plenty of people on that list who would pay to not have it released. Right now, they're okay because the restraining order prevents it from being released anyway. Once that's lifted, it becomes a bargaining chip again.
 
Unless it's Bernie, it sounds like another planted story. The obvious implication is that it's Cruz, but the madam was busted in '08. Cruz wasn't married until 2001 and was in TX from '03 -'13.

Btw- The "attorney" in question was disbarred, a birther, and sued the Supreme Court for treason—twice.
 
Btw- The "attorney" in question was disbarred, a birther, and sued the Supreme Court for treason—twice.

This is amazing. These eccentric crazies used to add flavour to American stories, but now everyday happenings are comprised largely of these crazy bastards. Doesn't matter if it's the left or the right: crazy is the new normal in America.
 
I read this story a few days back and I don't see how the election justifies releasing the records. It doesn't matter that it would be damaging to one of the candidates. If this was really about the election, he could just leak the specific candidate's information to a reporter and tell them go dig for corroboration.

The cynic in me thinks this is really about making some cash. There are plenty of people on that list who would pay to not have it released. Right now, they're okay because the restraining order prevents it from being released anyway. Once that's lifted, it becomes a bargaining chip again.

Never thought of this. this is probably what's going on.
 
Back
Top