- Joined
- Mar 9, 2015
- Messages
- 8,179
- Reaction score
- 5
I hope it was a Miata
the reebok deal wouldn't stop them giving him another car now, would it?
You are the one missing the point.
Before Reebok, the fighters could maximize their income from outside sponsors.
Under Reebok, a deal imposed without any consultation with fighters, the fighters now make peanuts.
In every single professional sport except the UFC, the top players make far more in sponsors than they do from actual winnings.
What this means for the UFC is that we will continue to get part-time fighters (Carwin) and accountants with 4 years' training (Correia) as title challengers.
Obviously the reebok deal sucks for the fighters, but it doesn't really bother me. "Attracting the best athletes" is a silly argument that is used often. What other sport are women and guys under 170 lbs going to do instead? For the average fighter, pay is never going to rival other major sports and the reebok deal isn't going to prevent guys with no other options from doing it anyway.
Before the reebok deal, this forum was full of guys complaining how little fighters get paid and now it's about how reebok ruined the great deal these guys had before. We already knew promoters, and most bosses in general, are pretty greedy and take advantage of employees, but that isn't what is preventing more guys from doing it.
Dude a car is one thing but he might of been given a Conor McGregor fight kit. That shit is currency.
The UFC didn't force anyone to drop their sponsors, only that they wear Reebok uniforms at several key UFC-held events during fight week. The fighters are free to get sponsored by anything and anyone in the other 360 days of the year.
If your sponsors would drop you because of that tiny fight night/weigh in stipulation, then it stands to argue that the sponsorship opportunity wasn't really created by you as an athlete, but rather by the exposure of the UFC platform, and if that's the case, the UFC clearly should be the one calling the shots.
This is the issue right here. As long as the bolded part is true, the sport will be hampered in it's growth. It's pretty obvious it's hurting us viewers in the long run, so you should care. And for sports under 170 lbs there are several. In the EU we have this sport called football that I believe is growing in the US as well.
Only women and children play soccer in the U.S.