Ponderosa's WH recordings

spamking said:
Nothing to look more closely at . . . some politicians are always politicians. Just as some business folks are always business folks. They tell folks what they want to hear in order to get the result they themselves want . . .

Just like you shift talking points on here to suit your narrative.
Click to expand...

My position is constant. Like bedrock.

Donald Trump is a fucking idiot and you're all rubes that support and defend his constant incompetence.

The Omarosa situation itself is the result of pure incompetence at the highest levels of government.
 
Rational Poster said:
My position is constant. Like bedrock.

Donald Trump is a fucking idiot and you're all rubes that support and defend his constant incompetence.
Click to expand...

Uh huh . . . I've definitely continually praised Trump on here. Never once criticized or pointed out his incompetence.
 
Rational Poster said:
He's such a little bitch lol.

He tells whoever he's talking to what they want to hear. It's so blatant I feel bad for all of you that fall for it.
Click to expand...
I agree with this.

But I think this applies to all politicians as well.
 
Falsedawn said:
Quote the statute. Not seeing the detail you're trying to cite.
Click to expand...

I think he just did.

But if you want to cling to the belief that it's legal to secretly record someone without their consent, so be it.
 
sniper said:
I agree with this.

But I think this applies to all politicians as well.
Click to expand...

That conversation was weak as fuck.

There is no way around it.

A total softy that made his name firing people on television can't even handle it in real life.

He should have just sent her a text message, fucking pussy.
 
spamking said:
Uh huh . . . I've definitely continually praised Trump on here. Never once criticized or pointed out his incompetence.
Click to expand...

Yet you seem quite content floating out the "just a politician" bullshit like it means anything here.

This isn't political BS here, it's personal weakness.

That's not how a President or CEO should behave.

Goddamn it!
 
Last edited:
Falsedawn said:
Quote the statute. Not seeing the detail you're trying to cite.
Click to expand...
He appears to have made a substantial error with regard to reading comprehension. It's okay, we all make mistakes! #positivity
 
Is there anything interesting about what Trump says on the recording?

I listened but can't see the big deal.
 
glenwo2 said:
I think he just did.

But if you want to cling to the belief that it's legal to secretly record someone without their consent, so be it.
Click to expand...

In one party consent states, it is. That's the point. A federal law "superseding" state law with regard to recording consent is new to me.

If that's all he's pointing at, he's wrong.
 
OeuvrePressure said:
I figure her edi
Click to expand...
Fluffernutter said:
Bringing a recording devise (or any electronic that transmits...anything) is a HUGE no-no.

Bringing a cell phone or even a fitbit into a Controlled Access Area will lead to a loss of a security clearance.

However, I'm not sure she cares about that. She's looking for a book deal and an afternoon talkshow, not a position where one needs a clearance.

Since her recording had no national security information on it, she broke no laws.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%. It has been a while since I was in a SCIF. AT that time the issue was pagers. I'll bet more than a few Apple watches get worn in. Back when I was in SCIF's at the Pentagon the rule was that anything brought into the SCIF that violated the rules could not leave. That meant a lot of floppy disks, pagers, and calculators were in a big box waiting to be incinerated. I wonder of that is still the case.
 
Falsedawn said:
In one party consent states, it is. That's the point. A federal law "superseding" state law with regard to recording consent is new to me.

If that's all he's pointing at, he's wrong.
Click to expand...

Regardless, I think it's totally stupid to be able to secretly record someone without their consent in ANY state.

That's an invasion of privacy as far as I am concerned.
 
Gluteus Swag said:


Looks like Omarosa is just making shit up
Click to expand...



I love all of these people surrounded by Trump reading her book. It's as if they are trying to see if anything about them comes up and if it is damaging. Sounds to me that either her marketing approached worked or these people are worried because they said/did stuff that would make them look bad.
 
Rational Poster said:
Yet you seem quite content floating out the "just a politician" bullshit like it means anything here.
Click to expand...

Just because you scoff at the comment doesn't mean it isn't applicable. Stop being naive about all of this and pushing your own bucket of crap by implying that Trump is the first politician to be seen as a scum bag.

This isn't political BS here, it's personal weakness.
Click to expand...

Again . . . how does this refute my comment? You can't have one without the other in many cases.

That's not how a President or CEO should behave.

Goddamn it!
Click to expand...

If you say so . . .

Are you okay? Do you need to talk to someone?
 
woodguyatl said:
I agree 100%. It has been a while since I was in a SCIF. AT that time the issue was pagers. I'll bet more than a few Apple watches get worn in. Back when I was in SCIF's at the Pentagon the rule was that anything brought into the SCIF that violated the rules could not leave. That meant a lot of floppy disks, pagers, and calculators were in a big box waiting to be incinerated. I wonder of that is still the case.
Click to expand...
We jailed someone for seven years for this at my command
 
Just another distraction in this shit administration...Who really gives a shit.


But I find it hilarious how omarosa 4d chessed the fuck out of Trump lol.
 
spamking said:
Just because you scoff at the comment doesn't mean it isn't applicable. Stop being naive about all of this and pushing your own bucket of crap by implying that Trump is the first politician to be seen as a scum bag.



Again . . . how does this refute my comment? You can't have one without the other in many cases.



If you say so . . .

Are you okay? Do you need to talk to someone?
Click to expand...

Nope I was just feigning outrage like the Pussy-in-Chief.
 
Rational Poster said:
He's such a little bitch lol.

He tells whoever he's talking to what they want to hear. It's so blatant I feel bad for all of you that fall for it.
Click to expand...

If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor

A YouTube video was the cause for Benghazi

There are more black men in prisons than in universities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,419
Messages
55,418,972
Members
174,765
Latest member
durbanik916

Share this page

Back
Top