Economy (Poll) Is globalization good or bad?

Is globalization good or bad

  • Good: It's inevitable and makes life easier with more products and less war

    Votes: 12 20.3%

  • Bad: Environmentally damaging, cultural destruction and NWO controlled by cabal of elites

    Votes: 47 79.7%
  • Total voters
    59
Ophydian said:
There hasn’t been a world war in over 80 years when globalism wasn’t a thing. If you want to talk about regional conflicts as war then I’m not sure you understand how devastating global wars can be.
Click to expand...
And globalism could perhaps usher in the war that finally fucks us all, and I’ll have to send you a carrier pigeon with a note telling you “I told you so”
 
Never Gonna happen successfully , at least for the next 1000 years..if it could ever be a thing, it will only be successful if it occurs organically..
 
When I look at globalism I look at it from an end goal perspective and not what’s going on 20 years from now. We either get to continue as a species or die as individuals. If you want to die as an individual then I hope you don’t plan to have children because then what’s the point of passing on your DNA?
 
Lol "cabal of elites" is really going to bury the second option.

I'd keep the emphasis on negative local impacts if you want to keep things interesting.
 
Proud American said:
Yes there is! My goodness
Click to expand...

Like what? What wars are specifically related to globalization?

Iraq? No. It's oil grabbing and protecting Israel.
Afghanistan? No.
Russian annexation of Ukraine? No.
India/Pakistani Kashmir? No.

China putting a death grip on the US economically is a mini economic war, not a full scale war like what I mean. China is very happy right now, we are outsourcing to them because it's cheaper, they squeeze us. Spy on us. Destabilize the world. Ok..I'll give you that maybe it's a globalization cold war.

If there are contemporary wars pertaining to globalization, I'd admit it. I am not for or against it in any way, it's just that facts are facts. That's all.
 
Last edited:
Tycho Brah said:
Lol "cabal of elites" is really going to bury the second option.

I'd keep the emphasis on negative local impacts if you want to keep things interesting.
Click to expand...

I wasn't sure if I should add cabal of elites. It was too tempting to keep out. LOL. I have no evidence for it, but the dark corners of the mind can't stop thinking about it. I am sure there are interest groups pulling strings. Just look at the USA alone for example, with lobby groups such as AIPAC, Gun, Evangelical, Pharma, etc. putting millions of dollars for ideological control. You don't think that is happening at the global/UN scale? UN is extremely corrupt. I describe a bit of it in the OP under the Bad section #5. I can't keep out cabal of elites at the moment.
 
mmafan2000 said:
I wasn't sure if I should add cabal of elites. It was too tempting to keep out. LOL. I have no evidence for it, but the dark corners of the mind can't stop thinking about it. I am sure there are interest groups pulling strings. Just look at the USA alone for example, with lobby groups such as AIPAC, Gun, Evangelical, Pharma, etc. putting millions of dollars for ideological control. You don't think that is happening at the global/UN scale? UN is extremely corrupt. I describe a bit of it in the OP under the Bad section #5. I can't keep out cabal of elites at the moment.
Click to expand...
Lol turns out it's still winning so what do I know...
 
lilelvis said:
We are tribal, always will be. Globalism defies human nature.
Click to expand...

So should we not even have countries either then? Even if America withdraws from the rest of the world we are still not going to get 330,000,000 people to get along peacefully. Look at how much internal fighting there is right now.

The problem is peoples' obsession with an identity. Stop caring about pride in nation, being proud of race, etc and I think we'd come a lot closer to reaching that goal. It is tough but it could be done someday maybe.
 
Trotsky living in a utopian fantasy land as usual in here....

Cohesive....lol. It's like you've never picked up a history book in your life. Pipe dream nonsense, especially for somebody advocating larger human populations on this finite resource.

Globalisation will only serve to further line the pockets of corporate interests (what the guy rails against, lol) the likes we've never seen before. The power and control of megacorporations and monopolies is inevitable with the acceptance of these economic systems, and this guy thinks it's good for long-term sustainability.

He's well educated on policy and legislation, absolutely inept at understanding anything about the human condition - ironically just like his idols.

<{Heymansnicker}>

You have to take corruption and greed into account for all decisions, not pretend you're going to sidestep it or suddenly eliminate it. Globalisation is the ultimate end-game vision of of true socialism (one world gov, money, rules, etc.) hence why daydreamers like Hack Savage & Comrade Lev are blindly in support.

These guys are afraid of the natural order.
 
It’s not exactly one or the other. There should be a third option.
 
Please update Option B to not include horseshit about NWO and cabals so you've got a reasonable poll. Sheesh.
 
Overall its good in that the winners will eliminate all opposition and unite earth. Probably be Chinese but whatever

Its application are bad for the masses
 
It's not just good, it's inevitable. The benefits far outweigh any real or imagined downsides.

Also, you can't say you love capitalism but hate globalism.
 
Hard to have absolute stance, because it brings negative and positive effects at same time

But voted negative, as i don't think these effects are 50-50
 
bringing the world closer together and less war=bombing your country for not accepting sodomy and other degenerate western values
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,979
Messages
55,458,746
Members
174,787
Latest member
Freddie556

Share this page

Back
Top