I teach math and have a second grade son learning this new math, and I side with the teacher. The teacher has been teaching this strategy in class for several weeks (at this point in the year). The question is worded poorly. It should have read: How can you use the Make 10 Strategy when you are adding 8 + 5?
The answer is (8 + 2) + 3 = 13.
I have a second grader who is also learning this, and it is a useful strategy.
The problem is that most people who "learned" math only know how to think of things one way. They can only replicate the processes of math in the way they were taught. They do not know how to look at the same problem they know how to solve and think of other possible ways of solving it.
This leads to an unintelligent general population that is locked into copying the math that they previously "learned." When math learning is reduced to easily copied computations, students end up poorer for it.
Computers (and eventually robots) are far faster, more accurate, and cheaper than people at completing repetitive tasks. We do not want to teach students how to be good computers. We want to teach students how to think flexibly so they will be able to adapt to the brave new world we are entering.
Here is a response that was extremely well-received on another website:
Hi, I'm a mathematician. I'm a data scientist now but when I was in graduate school I was working through an NSF scholarship which involved testing various elements of the what would become the common core in the in classroom.
While this problem is poorly worded, the make 10 strategy is quite sound and a great, great way to improve children's performance on mental arithmetic. It's how I've always thought about mental arithmetic, it's how every math person I know thinks of mental arithmetic, and now, it's how we're teaching it.
That guy can go "fuck" himself
Strange that they're teaching this "make 10" strategy. When I was a kid that's something I came up with on my own and my teachers told me it was wrong, that I should solve math in as few of steps as possible... "making 10" is a wasted step that slows you down.
I guess I was right and they were wrong.
Strange that they're teaching this "make 10" strategy. When I was a kid that's something I came up with on my own and my teachers told me it was wrong, that I should solve math in as few of steps as possible... "making 10" is a wasted step that slows you down.
I guess I was right and they were wrong.
So, like, you make ten by adding two from the five, and then throw the remaining three away?