- Joined
- Aug 6, 2013
- Messages
- 3,899
- Reaction score
- 0
Bullshit.
Don't let facts get in the way of your narrative whatever you do:
In the FBI
Bullshit.
No it isn't, the definitions are very different between nations of what actually constitutes violent crime. Common assault for example is included in the UK definition but is excluded from the US definition.
Don't let facts get in the way of your narrative whatever you do:
In the FBI
I found this piece that addresses the same issue.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-media-post-says-uk-has-far-higher-violent-c/
I saw it as well, it mentions that the murder rate is 4 times higher in the US than the UK, but Byron does not want to be part of a society like the UK. He'd much rather be part of one where the murder rate is 4 times higher.
Don't let facts get in the way of your narrative whatever you do:
In the FBI
If you apply the same definition to the US that is used in the UK then the violent crime rate is higher in the UK.
I saw it as well, it mentions that the murder rate is 4 times higher in the US than the UK, but Byron does not want to be part of a society like the UK. He'd much rather be part of one where the murder rate is 4 times higher.
I still would rather have the freedoms I have even if the crime rate is higher. If you break it down by crime then that
I saw it as well, it mentions that the murder rate is 4 times higher in the US than the UK, but Byron does not want to be part of a society like the UK. He'd much rather be part of one where the murder rate is 4 times higher.
yeah who cares about crime rates i just want to be able to have a gun...
And what's his aim now? More Twitter followers?
Who knows! I doubt he has many offers coming in, but still needs to stay relevant and seems to be keeping this troll-job going.
I want the freedom to defend my family, myself and others when necessary.
Also I like that US version of free speech.
I hear you guys have all but banned the carry of any knife, how
I'm beginning to see that you don't even understand what "distorting" facts means. In no way shape or form did I represent the killing of the armed guard as Cho's shootout. I didn't even imply it. I simply pointed out that killing an armed guard isn't difficult using an ambush.Once again, you're completely distorting facts.
The Virginia Tech mass shooting and the Virginia Tech ambushed officer are two different events, seperated by 4 years.
Well, unless the "armed resistance" is the person carrying out the attack. You're the only person alive who seems to think there are people out there arguing that SWAT teams should wield plastic swords.Armed resistance increases the chance of survival - it's not guaranteed. Fact.