Why is that ?I seriously doubt that a cop would ever go on a killing spree at a school that he works at.
The first two will be punished accordingly, and the third was a case of mistaken home-defense. The girl lied and said it was an intruder, she didn't say "Daddy, I was banging this guy, it's OK."
Living in a free society requires freedom, and consequences.
Why is that ?
Police are impervious to suffering from mental health illness, or can't possibly have a breakdown ?
I've seen many good officers forced on leave.
Police in elementary schools won't remedy the problem
Nothing.....my point is just because it hasnt happen, doesnt mean it will never happen. The point is the reaction to something like that will only be more guns so we can deal with it better in the future
So we're all good hear except for the third. Where a young black guy got shot because he may have been reaching for something. Perfect gun abiding society we have here.
This is as close as it gets:
[YT]_ePx61TkXKY[/YT]
Btw, does this really deserve its own thread? You could've just posted it in the shooting thread.
I would have assumed the same of a soldier at his stationed military base, and I would have been wrong. It's a valid point.I seriously doubt that a cop would ever go on a killing spree at a school that he works at.
I would have assumed the same of a soldier at his stationed military base, and I would have been wrong. It's a valid point.
If we can't trust our military not to murder their fellow soldiers/citizens, then who in the hell can we trust?If we can't trust our police to not murder children they're supposed to be protecting, than who the hell can we trust?
It was a terrible idea, but it did delay the inevitable. He managed to create a narrative and get some momentum, imagine his show without him pretending he cares about guns?? It would have been dead in the water from the off.
well since we made guns illegal we have not had any of the problems you seem to be talking about. in fact the only GUN problems have been criminals shooting other criminals (and the occasional stray bullet)
and your question "Do you or do you not have a right to self defense" well i'm 43 years old and have not needed a gun to defend myself.
now that said, it seems Americans want guns and i'm not in a position to tell you what you should and shouldn't do. just stop the "you need guns to defend yourself" crap....because that is just a lie.
The same here in Britain. Gun crime is just something you pretty much don't have to worry about.
I think it's probably got something to do with the fact that there aren't more guns than people here, but I could just be talking crazy.
The sign from a private school in Arkansas, in which their school staff is armed.
I have no objections to a weapon in proper, responsible hands being used as a countermeasure in any school. I think the sign alone would be a reasonable deterrent and even make a potential shooter think twice.
The entire point of the 2nd Amendment is that no one can (or should) be trusted: specifically the government. One must remember that the government- like corporations- are ultimately composed of people. The police are a paramilitary arm of that government. One should not be unduly selective in their application of logic.
Your violent crime rate is much higher.
People are at the mercy of bigger, stronger, younger hooligans.
That's not the society I want to live in.
True, and that's a shitty thing. I still think it's preferable to the alternative, though. I mean, getting beaten up really sucks, but I'll take it over being shot any day.
If we can't trust our military not to murder their fellow soldiers/citizens, then who in the hell can we trust?
The entire point of the 2nd Amendment is that no one can (or should) be trusted: specifically the government. One must remember that the government- like corporations- are ultimately composed of people. The police are a paramilitary arm of that government. One should not be unduly selective in their application of logic.