Crime Perjuring the Swamp (New report: Trump instructed Cohen to lie to Congress) +WOW+ (SCO Thread v. 27)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quipling

classical conservative
@Silver
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
10,949
Reaction score
1,331
Previous Thread

Current big news:

  • BuzzFeed has reported that Trump personally directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about a construction deal in Moscow. They cite two unnamed federal officials and underlying documents and texts.
  • Democrats have called on Trump to resign or face impeachment.
  • Two days earlier, Bill Barr, the AG nominee, said that lying to Congress or asking someone to lie to Congress could be obstruction of justice and an impeachable offense.
  • Cohen has separately alleged that Trump instructed him to hire people to rig polls in 2013 and 2014.
  • OSC has filed more than 200 pages detailing the ways in which Paul Manafort violated his plea agreement.
Mod note from previous thread: Please post in here with regards to the subject at hand. Any general chat can go in the WR Lounge thread.

Just to be clear, going forward, these type of posts also count of derailing:
1. Talking about how the thread is derailed/ how mods should handle a situation (report and continue on topic discussions)
2. Joking about posters who are reply banned from the thread
3. Posts with only flaming that do not have any other information about the topic
4. A reply to any of the above

Stop doing these. This isn't some game of getting each other reply bans and infractions. Just stay on topic, report when needed. We have the WR OT for posts like the ones above but they have no place in a normal thread.

Major events so far:

  • Manafort, Trump's campaign manager and transition committee member has been indicted arising from misconduct reaching into 2017 related to payments received through 2014 from the pro-russia faction of Ukraine's pre-war government. Manafort pleaded guilty agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors, and then lied to them.
  • Michael Cohen, Trump's attorney, has pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations, which he claims to have committed at Trump's direction to influence the election. Cohen cooperated with federal prosecutors and received a 3-year sentence.
  • Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Org. CFO, has agreed to immunity in exchange for cooperating with federal prosecutors
  • Rick Gates has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and conspiring (with Manafort) to commiting tax fraud, failing to register as a foreign agent, and lying to the FBI
  • George Papadopolous pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in 2017 about activities occuring 2016-17. Admits to meeting with various Russian officials regarding setting up meetings and "dirt" on Hillary while acting on behalf of the Trump campaign, something he previously denied. Papadopoulos is now accusing Mifsud of being a deep state plant on Twitter.
  • Mike Flynn, Trump's National Security Advisor, has also pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about several meetings that he had with the Russian ambassador. Flynn was allegedly involved in other business involving Turkey, but has not yet been charged with respect to that behavior.
  • 13 Russian indictment for activity starting in 2014 and continuing through 2017. A US citizen pleaded guilty for agreeing to help them. There is also a separate 12 count indictment targeting GRU officers
  • An attorney linked to Manafort, Gates, and a Russian oligarch has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI
  • Yohai, Manafort's former son-in-law has agreed to cooperate with the Justice Department
  • Daniels's lawsuit has somehow, insanely, gotten linked up to the Mueller investigation thanks to alleged wrongdoing and influence-peddling by Michael Cohen. Who has pleaded guilty and offered to fully cooperate.
  • Twelve Russian intelligence officers have been indicted for conspiracy against the United States and aggravated identity theft
  • Bruce Ohr, of dossier fame, has been working to obtain information from Russian oligarchs since 2014.
  • Documents relating to Manafort's guilty plea implicate Tony Podesta. Tony Podesta is the brother of Clinton's campaign advisor, John Podesta. His former firm, which is now cooperating with the probe, worked for Manafort in Ukraine.
Dumb talking points:
Collusion isn't a crime!
No. Conspiracy to do crimes is.
Where's the evidence?
There's been plenty in the links and throughout the threads, and appears to be a ton more under seal. If you've missed the evidence it's because you haven't looked.
That wasn't a criminal campaign finance violation because Edwards!
The sticking point was willfullness. That's satisfied in Trump's case.
Fruit of the poisonious tree!
That excludes evidence obtained during an illegal search. You need to identify that search. It also doesn't vacate guilty pleas.
Comey told Flynn not to bring a lawyer!
Nope. He said he could, but other lawyers would also be involved. That's ok. Also, not letting someone have a lawyer comes under the fifth amendment and requires other circumstances not applicable here.
They already had what they needed! The like wasn't material! Perjury trap!
Materiality turns on whether something is important to the investigation. X can be a material fact even if there's already evidence on that specific issue, because lying about x keeps the investigator to getting to underlying facts. In Flynn's case, lying about whether he had certain contacts meant investigators couldn't get to the underlying nature of the contacts.
The 304 has the wrong date!
That's an actual nothingburger
Phones deleted!
Yeah, after having their data reviewed by a federal agent.
 
Last edited:
In.

This is it. This is the thread that is going to conclude the Mueller thread series!
 
You know. Apparently they got Trump red handed. Guilty right? So...where is the actual proof of any of his complicity. Mooler is just gonna drag it out till 2020 cuz he's also in the camp of you mooks who still cry over Hillary's loss

Where's the evidence?
There's been plenty in the links and throughout the threads, and appears to be a ton more under seal. If you've missed the evidence it's because you haven't looked.
 
After Rudy said that he never said there was no collusion , Breitbart commenters are now saying that collusion isn't a crime. So we have gone from There is no collusion to Collusion is not a crime.
 
Solid title. I'd place a big wager on the Buzzfeed report being accurate, despite Leopold's instance of jumping the gun with a Karl Rove story back in the day. They're referring to emails, texts, and a "cache" of documents. I doubt they would go forward with the story without seeing some of that for themselves and also getting independent corroboration from trusted insiders, in addition to there being Cohen's own confirmation of the basic facts.
 
Don’t worry all, Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff on the case. They’ll get to the bottom of this stuff already being investigated by Mueller.

You'll recall the House Intelligence Committee was also investigating the same things as Mueller. Seems pretty standard for the house committee's to run parallel investigations, at least for the past couple of years.
 
Solid title. I'd place a big wager on the Buzzfeed report being accurate, despite Leopold's instance of jumping the gun with a Karl Rove story back in the day. They're referring to emails, texts, and a "cache" of documents. I doubt they would go forward with the story without seeing some of that for themselves and also getting independent corroboration from trusted insiders, in addition to there being Cohen's own confirmation of the basic facts.

It will be interesting to see what happens if there is hard proof of this. Not just testimony, but hard evidence like a tape, text, or email.

If it came to impeachment, would Republicans in the Senate really let that slide? The Dems let Bill's perjury and obstruction slide, but that was over getting hummers from interns. This is obstruction to conceal dealings with an adversarial government while running for President.

I am most curious as well if Trump would let it get to that point or would he just resign? He does not seem like the type to resign.
 
You'll recall the House Intelligence Committee was also investigating the same things as Mueller. Seems pretty standard for the house committee's to run parallel investigations, at least for the past couple of years.

I recall. It’s still funny thinking about our dumbass representatives looking into something already being looked at by actual investigators like they are going to crack the case or something.
 
It will be interesting to see what happens if there is hard proof of this. Not just testimony, but hard evidence like a tape, text, or email.

If it came to impeachment, would Republicans in the Senate really let that slide? The Dems let Bill's perjury and obstruction slide, but that was over getting hummers from interns. This is obstruction to conceal dealings with an adversarial government while running for President.

I am most curious as well if Trump would let it get to that point or would he just resign? He does not seem like the type to resign.

I think enough Repubs will turn on him.

McConnell actually seemed to be shaken when Mattis left in the way he did. Trump's approval ratings are slipping and they are finally starting to slip amongst his base.

The biggest Trump supporters are in the House.... in the Senate he's more tolerated because he has support amount R voters
 
Collusion doesn't matter at this point. Trump has committed obstruction of justice multiple times now.
 
You know. Apparently they got Trump red handed. Guilty right? So...where is the actual proof of any of his complicity. Mooler is just gonna drag it out till 2020 cuz he's also in the camp of you mooks who still cry over Hillary's loss

Mueller is a republican appointed by another republican.
 
120s55l.png
 
You realize the sources quoted in the report have seen the evidence directly, right?
Townhall said:
“So they had access to a number of different documents, 302 reports which are interview reports,” Cormier said. “That stuff was compiled as they began to look at who the players were speaking with, how those negotiations went, who all from the Trump organization and outside the organization were involved in getting that tower set up.”
Is this spin it?

You guys really want to run with this? Remember when you used to tell us there was "no collusion"? And the million different other things that wouldn't be proven because of "anonymous sources" before that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top