People saying Burns is old now when his WW wins were 40yo Maia, 40yo TWood, 40yo Wonderman, journeyman Magny and 40yo Jorge

ExitLUPin

K
@Steel
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
32,115
Reaction score
50,162
Truth is Burns was top 5 in one of the worst eras of the division. A journeyman LW moves up and beats washed WWs and people think he's this elite WW. No look at his wins.....

Loses to

Khamzat
Belal
Jack
Brady
Morales

Actually strong primed WWs. Burns was a top WW in the WOAT Kamaru and Colby era nothing more. Now that the division has gotten strong talent the last few years he can no longer compete at the top.
 
Some of the dates don't match up.
 
Truth is Burns was top 5 in one of the worst eras of the division. A journeyman LW moves up and beats washed WWs and people think he's this elite WW. No look at his wins.....

Loses to

Khamzat
Belal
Jack
Brady
Morales

Actually strong primed WWs. Burns was a top WW in the WOAT Kamaru and Colby era nothing more. Now that the division has gotten strong talent the last few years he can no longer compete at the top.
+1
 
I've being working on a piece about this.


Hear it is


In the UFC, stardom isn’t permanent—it’s an asset. Fighters aren’t just athletes; they’re investments. And like any good business, the UFC knows how to leverage their stars for maximum return—even if that means burning through them when the time is right.

It’s not a conspiracy. It’s a pattern. And if you follow the matchups, it becomes crystal clear: once a fighter reaches a certain level of fame, the UFC matches them against other known names to keep the value cycle spinning.

Until it stops. Then they feed them to the next generation.


The Lifecycle of a UFC Star

  1. They build you.
    • They invest promo time, media exposure, highlight reels, and narrative around your rise.
    • They pair you with favorable matchups to build momentum.
  2. They cash you in.
    • Once you’ve reached peak marketability, you start facing other stars. It’s all about name vs. name.
    • Think: Masvidal vs. Diaz. Chandler vs. Ferguson. McGregor vs. Cowboy.
    • The fights are often more about attention than rankings.
  3. They feed you forward.
    • When you’ve lost 2–3 and the shine has faded, you’re matched against the next guy they’re grooming.
    • Suddenly, you’re the gatekeeper. And when the new guy beats you, it looks like a huge win.
    • Think: Lawler to Covington. Woodley to Burns. Masvidal to Usman and Chandler to Paddy
This isn’t about competition. It’s about value extraction.


Rankings Are Tools, Not Truth

Ever notice how some fighters stay in the top 5 despite multiple losses? That’s not accidental—it’s strategic.

As long as a name holds value, it’s kept near the top to:

  • Justify big fights
  • Give up-and-comers a "ranked" scalp
  • Maintain the illusion of elite status
When it’s time to pass the torch, the rankings become a bridge—not a barrier.


The Real Game: Controlled Star Power

The UFC doesn’t want stars who outgrow the promotion.They want stars who generate money—until they don’t.

And when the ROI slows down, those same stars become launch pads for the next era of contenders.

It’s efficient. It’s profitable.And if you’re paying attention—it’s obvious.


Conclusion

Fighters rise. Fighters fall. But in the UFC system, it’s rarely by accident.

The company keeps stars at the top just long enough to squeeze out every bit of promotional return—then hands them off to a hungrier, younger fighter with just enough push behind them.

It’s not cruel. It’s not personal.

It’s business.

And the UFC runs it like a machine that never stops moving—even when the wheels fall off.
 
Last edited:
burt looked very very much like a Lightweight against a.... bigger than a lightweight in this fight... the 10ish inch reach diff was laughable... Dood shoulda stayed at 155
 
He's elite and well rounded, a fun fight to watch but, it's concerning that he's now getting finished instead of losing by decision.
 
Bro is soon to be 39 years old and was facing a top 25 year old contender entering his prime. But you’re right… Gilbert he was never good 🙄
 
May be mean to kick a man while he's down, but if we can aknowledge Burns is washed at 38, then we can see how weak his resume is.
Here is a list of all his ranked wins and their age at the time he fought them : Maia (42 years old), Woodley (38 years old), Wonderboy (38 years old), Magny (35 years old) and Masvidal (38 years old).
Now to be fair, he has some good wins over guys that just happened not to have a ranking next to their names like Gunnar, OAM and Mike Davis and unlike Colby he didn't duck the up and comers, he just lost to them.

But that's just the way the UFC ranking works, if you beat some guys on the prelims, you are given fights with old vets past their prime to get their spots, occasionally fights other guys in their prime who did the same thing, and once you are old enough and start losing more than you win you get fed to the new generation.
 
Burns is the Anthony Edwards of the UFC.

Antman has gone through KD, Booker, Jokic, Murray, Luka, LeBron and Jimmy.... If we exclude KD, LeBron and Jimmy since they are past their prime that's still a great resume for how young he is.

Burns has beaten 40yo Maia, 40yo TWood, 40yo Wonderman, Neil Magny and 40yo Jorge. Burns isn't Ant he is like Mike Conley.
 
TS will make people mad, but I was saying the same thing 5 years ago when Colby was getting bashed for beating old guys but Burns wasn't.

What was Burns best win? Who was the best guy he beat who wasn't at least several years past his prime?

Losing to Khamzat in a close fight was his career highlight IMO.
 
The age thing is getting way to blown up now a days. If someone is fit and healthy age does not matter. What matters is how much damage theyve taken and if their mind is in it.
 
The age thing is getting way to blown up now a days. If someone is fit and healthy age does not matter. What matters is how much damage theyve taken and if their mind is in it.
Age doesn't matter, what a load of shit
 
I agree.

Burns is a very skilled fighter though. He was a Lightweight that came up to Welterweight. He beat good fighters and had tough wars in some of his losses. He had good moments against Khamzat, JDM and Usman.

Yes, it's also true some of his best wins were against aging veterans.

It's also true that he is now getting old and battle worn.

All of these things can be true at the same time.

Much respect to Gilbert. A very well rounded fighter that fought a lot of great fighters.
 
Back
Top